PAGE 2 CAI ADM 2824 VNCLAS AddeiiaOuiepheathi@dbley / IMMEDIATELY TO TELL “E IF THIS ASSUMPTION IS CORRECT. I WOULD APPRECIATE A SUFFICIENTLY DETAILED RESPONSE DESCRIBING THE SURVEY SO THAT I CAN MAKE AN INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT ABOUT ITS POTENTIAL ae wet IMPACT. _'TPLEASE ADDRESS YOUR RESPONSE TO ME C/O BOYCE R. BROWN, MATTOCH, . EDMUNDS, KEMPER & BROWN, SUITE HAWAIT 1481, 841 BISHOP STREET, HONOLULU, 96815." iREee Hh, E PART TwOs I AM CONCERNED ABOUT THE POSSIBLE IMPACT OF OUR ANSWER TO ® THIS LETTER FOR TwO REASONS: A» IT COULD SUGGEST THAT WE CONCEDE THAT WE ARE OBLIGATED TO SATISFY gr SOME PRIVATE INTEREST AS TO THE ADEQUACY OR ACCEPTABILITY OF s OUR PLANNED ACTIONS. THIS MIGHT CARRY OVER WITH MORE SERIOUS “IMPLICATIONS TO THE DOD CLEANUP EFFORT. #8. NO MATTER HOW CAREFULLY WE DESCRIBE THE SURVEY IN ADVANCE, WE PMAY ANTICIPATE THAT WE WILL MAKE SOME CHANGES WHILE IT IS IN PROGRESS. WE MAY, FOR EXAMPLE, FIND IT FEASIBLE AND DESIRABLE TO CONDUCT SOME FORM OF AERIAL MONITORING AND MAPPING EFFORT, THOUGH THIS IS NOT NOW A PART OF OUR PLAN. NOTE ALSO THAT THE LETTER DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THE PLAN FOR A CONCURRENT DOD ENGINEERING SURVEY. PART THREE: ACKNOWLEDGING THAT SOME RESPONSE IS REQUIRED, I Pp ufe ~