will be no different in method for certification, the history of the island and available data do indicate a probable requirement for higher density survey than may be required for other islands. This led to a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of placing contaminated stockpiles on relatively wncontaminated areas. It would generally be better to put contaminated stockpiles in areas known to be contaminated to similar or higher levels. The "cool" area requires relatively few sampling sites and characterization effort. 15. It was agreed that when resources permit it would be highly desirable to use one IMP to further refine the area of surface contamination to be removed. These areas are defined, in the Fig/Quince Area, by aerial survey contours. The Cactus Crater area is not defined. In-Siles survey me ween a te NE ar ee PO Or Cane baeee on eel to place the contaminated stockpile in the "hot" area may interfere with the refinement would assist considerably in refining the estimates of area, and thus volume, to be excised. Mr. Church proposed to use the JMP only to move im toward hot areas and define the periphery of those areas over 400 Pci/g. This would not be a full survey but would refine the area LM Onan t ae ane ery BONE Ore ome ray boundries and wovld avoid risk of high contamination of the IAP. There was discussion of use of this "peripheral" technique as compared to a full ‘survey. It was agreed that the peripheral technique would not totally define the surface area but certainly should provide better estimating data than the