field was determined from experimentation in the laboratory

with “spiked" sea water samples and in general was a double
precipitation process

in which most fission products were

brought down in a ferric hydroxide scavenge.
strontium were precipitated as oxalates.

Calcium and

The specific pro-

cedures are outlined in the Appendix.

Results.

Results are presented in Table 1.

It is to

be noted that the values in this table are in terms of milliliters of water sample and that the disintegration rate is

as stated and not in thousands as has been used in other

tables in this report.
scavenge"

Also the values for both the "Pe (OH) 3.

and the "Ca-Sr oxalate", even though small, have

considerable reliability because the values have been based

on large samples.

The total sample activity was divided by

the number of milliliters

in the sample,

which was 6,000 for

The

the pre-test samples and 500 for the post test samples.

values for “whole sample" (post shot) were based on a 3-milliliter sample that was withdrawn vefore precipitation and hence

would be expected to be less reliable.
From inspection of Table 1 thefollowing conclusions can |
be drawn.

For the pre-test samples radioactivity of the

Bogombogo sample was considerably greater than for other.
stations.

Why it was greater is not known, but activity of

plankton samples was also greatest from this

station.

There

were small but measurable amounts of activity in water samples
from other stations.

For the post test samples the amount of

activity in the samples was closely and inversely related to

|
GINA
MF At

*

Select target paragraph3