W. J. Bair/R. O. Gilbert July 9, 1979 Page 3 If they are using the TGLM lung model, it might be nice to present lung dose results elsewhere than Appendix B. This would make it easier to see how ingestion and external pathways dominate the doses. The data in the last set of tables in Appendix D need <9 be more clearly labeled. Units and definition of the percent variation (by island?) would make life easier. The year during which the maximum annual dose occurs is useful. I do not always get the total body and bone to peak in the same year. (They don't either, but it is not obvious from the dose tables.) It would be easy to put this on the tables and I think the reader needs it. I have not tried to duplicate all the possible diet/residence scenarios they presented. I have only tried in the limited time available to audit the dose methods and assumptions. As a rule, they look o.k. T have included a table of accumulated doses to illustrate how my calculations compare with Livermore's. This is one of the spot-checks I have made. The °°Sr bone doses include the 0.32 correction and the !37Cs total body doses include the 0.85 correction. ° I will be out of town the week of July 9-13, but will be available for questions after the 15th. BAN: cs NOTE TO DICK GILBERT: I have been unable to contact Bill Phillips. and his seem to be on different wires (?). My phone