ACSAP Briefing Paper for the President's Fress “onference August 2h, 1960 GENAVA TEST BAL NEGOTIATIONS QUESTION Mr. President, the Geneva test ban negotiations recessed last Monday at the request of the U.S. and U.K. for a five week period. Did the U.S. seek a recess in order to develop a major move which we would present when the conference reconvenes? ANSWER We requested a recess simply in the belief that various proposals and counter-proposals regarding such key issues as on-= site inspection quotas, the phasing of the control system, safeguards for a seismic research proyram and the composition of the Control Commission would require detailed study by the governments concerned. Moreover, a recess seemed in order at this time to give the people involved in the negotiations at Geneva a respite from their demanding task. I might add, that no consideration is being given to a major shift in our present position in the Geneva negotiations. QUESTION lr. President, does the United States intend to go ahead with Project VELA regardless of whether or not the Soviet Union agrees to a coordinated research program? ANSWER Project VELA, of course, was initiated back in 1959 and consequently certain aspects of the program are already well under Way, as the Soviet Union is aware. We certainly will want to carry out the research necessary in this area. However, during the current REPRODUCED AT THE DWIGHT D. ELSENHOWER LIBRARY recess in the negotiations, consideration will be given to ways and means of doing this, bearing in mind the Soviet Union's positions on the matter, QUESTION Hr. President, reports indicated that Mr. McCone's and ir. Merchant's trip to London last week was undertaken to overcome certain differences between the U.S. and U.K. on matters pertaining to the Geneva test ban negotiations. Were these differences ironed out ? neromontuyen) COLLECTION BOxNo _/O FOLDER Confrence.Sby|oo

Select target paragraph3