exposure was much greater than 650,000 r.
‘There is ne sound explanation
for Giscrepancies that eccur in the chemiea) data dertved fren 115.07
enf 113.08, and thus the reliability of the date from 113.04 becones
questionable.
Tt is felt that the initial exposure data frew 113.03 is reliable
since the total expesure was well established an4 the residual estinate
was valid. Date frou Stations 113.03, 113,04 end 113.09 agree with
results from previous events.
3.8 prscusstor
Pehle 5.16 summarises Redwing initial gamma exposure Gata, and
Zable 3.17 gives the totel yield, fission yield, and relative air
density for each event.
Figures 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4 are plots ef the
“f
Redwing initial gamma exposure versus distance end the EM 23-200 curves
for siniler tetal yield.
This method ef computation neglects the effect
of relative fission and fusion contributions te the total yield.
Correction factors discussed in Section 2.3.1 have been applied te adjust
the raw date to unshielded, betatron-calibrated exposure values. Cherokee
data were adjusted to reletive sir density ef 0.995. The initial gama
exposure from Cherokee, fhmi, and Navajo at 3 miles was about 1 r.
The
accuracy ef the initial gama exposure Gata as correctedis within + 50
perent.
gr, wow 5 FAC
Figures 3.5 through 3.8 show the tetal residual gaume exposures
plotted en maps.
These exposures are corrected for station shielding and
spectral response of the desineters (Section 2.3.2).
of the values from
In eidition, all
«a given shot were adjusted to the sane recovery time