ao \e3° 10° eee 164° 20° oo les° a t0 a oo tere ao | FORECAST AREA OF FALLOUT (METHOD 1} tae FORECAST “HOT LINE” (METHOD 1) ey FORECAST AREA —~ A OF FALLOUT an (METHOD 2) J pe ma ef a2 (Merton 3 ™N — \ PS MEASURED ISODOSE LO v4 RATE CONTOURS (e/prot the) \ . Wa ‘ FORECAST “HOT LINE” a ‘ | Z -~—f 7 i5 ‘ \ lf , 4g f f \\ VD 7 / f PARAMETER ASSUMPTIONS USED . CLOUD TOP. 85,000 FT 2. CLOUD BASE: 52,000 FT 3 CLOUD DIAMETER: 50 N MILES 4 HOT LINE FALLOUT: FROM 60,000 FT METHOD 2: TIME AND SPACE VARIATION OF THE WIND FIELD NOTE: CONTOURS FROM REFERENCE 13 WERE CONSTRUCTED ON THE BASIS OF EXTRAPOLATED PRELIMINARY DATA ANO ARE SUBJECT TO FINAL CORRECTIONS ‘ 2D 7 / G =) : ) VY C-q7-— — Wea [™. \, 1 L Lo é] . v ~~} f-— MEASURED | “HOT LINE” 7 na L— METEOROLOGICAL PARAMETERS METHOD |: TIME VARIATION OF THE WIND FIELD ~y e Cy. } r 5 pp : \,aS ei B AIA ~ A 1 ~ALLY? . xu \Ve / | a atone Ty om 4 ‘ fo 4 +L 7 FS 2) \ if ( \- Zh} 7 | |ft /% om \\ \ SIRIOR ERCHMOLTE ATOLL 4 UNI SURFACE ZERO 4 } monsear ate a fof Figure 4.8 Predictedand observedfalloutpattern,ShotZuni. - ' er } i gy te eave