,:::%

.............
..........
. ‘“”””l
...........
.........

TABLE
NCRP

DOSE

III
LIMITS

1/
-

Population

Individual
Whole

O. 5 rem/yr

body
.

Gonads
Gonads (alternative
objective)

D.

..............
.....
......
..........—.

3/
-

Criteria
A~ainst
Wlich
lVill Be Evaluated

Surve y Findings

O. 17 rem/yr
0.17

rem/yr

2/
–

5.0

rems/30

yrs

and Alternative

Measures

The Task Group approached
the question
of radiation
dose criteria
First,
FRC,
ICRP,
and NCRP
recommendations
from two directions.
reviewed
above were judged as to applicability
in this situation.
Second;
a risk approach
was re~iewed
using information
from
ICRP,
UNSCE-AR,
and the National
.Academy
of Science
BEIR
Committee.
The results
of this latter
effort
are summarized
in Part F which follows.
The radiological
survey of Enewetak
Atoll provides
a comprehensive
data base needed to deri~~e recommendations
relative
to the
These
recommendaradiologically
safe return of the Enewetak
people.
tions are to be based on an evaluation
of the significance
of all
radioacti~ity
on the -Atoll in terms
of the total exposure
to be exand on consideration
of those
pected in the returning
population,
-reasonable
actions
and constraints
which,
where made,
will result
in minimum
exposures.
The guidelines
used in ‘deriving
these recommendations
summarized
as two interdependent
considerations:

can be
t

Expected
exposures
should be minimized
and should fall in a
range consistent
v.ith guidance
put forward
by the Federal
Radiation
Council
(FRC).

For conditions
and qualifications
Radiation
Report No. 39, “Basic
........
......
...
........
.....
.. ...
. ....
....
.
... .... .,
.,
.........
....

To be applied as the-average
the United States as a whole.
Report No. 39.
See paragraph

247,

NCRP
III–6

on application,
see
Protection
Criteria.

yearly
value for
See paragraph
Report

No.

39.

NCRP
“

the population
247, NCRP

of

Select target paragraph3