TABLE 3.21 - Comparison of Radiation Field with Surface Density of Fallout Comnonents Sample Total Gamma Count per bottle (c/m x 10°? at 1 hr) Estimated Equivalent Field (r/hr at 1 hr) Ratio of Field to Coral Sur- |Ratio of Field to Sea “%ater Ratio of Field to Device Frectional face Density |Surfece Density Density (rf/primg/sq ft)|(r/oriml/sq rt) (r/nr:fraction/s9 ft) x 1-250.04 1-250.05 * 250.06 2,400 4,800 1,500 100(8) go(8) goa) 1-250.22 150 26(8) 89 ,000 11,000 6,900 200 2,900 10 1,650(8) 600(a) 350(8 219(8) 60(8) 22(a) 1250.17 94 1+250.24 1+250.25 1+251.02 1-251,03 1-251 .04 1-251 .05 1-251.06 1+251.07 1-251.08 1-251.10 2-AL, 2-85 2-04 2-P4 15 2,100 50 20 2,200 1,700 40 2 50(8) 2a(a) 30/2) 192) 30(a) 120 90 2 0.1 2-24 2-Ré, 2,000 9,000 110 480 2-139 2-¥40 3-250.05B 3-250.05R 310 2,600 8,300 &,500 20 140) 440 450 4,500 240 2-Th 3-250.07a 3-250 07% 1,700 4,500 90 240 0.035 0.024 0.057 c 0 0 9 19 15 o 6 1 0 0.048 0.13 0 0 0.4 0.15 0.15 0.003 1.7 0.01 0.607 0.01 0.005 29 6 ~ 23 69 15 0.14 0.039 0.056 C.038 | WAV 0 C 0 0 0 0 O 12 14 9 - 48 120 15 25 5 80 350 28 120 110 22 15 2 24 34 - 13 25 ° 18 uw Led 2.2 9 1.1. 8 0.9