cement dome in an atomic bomb crater
on Runt Island. The cleanup focused
on removing the large quantities of plu-

DANE

tonium, 4 Cuncer-causing agent danger-

ous for 240,000 years, on all parts of the
atoll.

Press visitors to Enewetak in early

*

SP A 19a
NAGASAKI A945
JOHNSTON
,
ENEWETAK
1958-62
. 71948 88 ae IXINI

9

»

43 tests

04

_°

046-58

2%

tests

12 tests

@ CHRISTMAS
196

25 Aests

MORUROA and

Se 1966 -present
76 tests
detected

COR RNUIDSEM

about 300. more than 10 percent comPiain of iime-size growths or tumors on

wil pans of their bodies. Ot nearby
bikiep. an article in the June 6, 1980.

Varonesian independent said “Out of
dun people who live on Likiep, there are
dosumented reports that hist nine

women who have given birth to babies

with sexere mental retardation, one
womun who had three ‘strange stillborn
babies. “one completely unrecognizable
as human.’ Also reported among
women on Likiep were ten other babies
that were not normal, a quite high perventare of the population.”
Aside from the birth defects. which
seem at almost epidemic proportions,
thyroid tumors are plaguing dozens of
people trom these and other islands.
indicating that these problems are not

Incddled events, people from even atoll

inthe Marshalls assert that arrowroot, a
mainstas inthe Marshallese dict before
the testing, has simply stopped producing
little attention has been paid to the
twenty-five Christmas Island tests, and
the twelve nuclear blasts at Johnston
Island. many of which were hydrogen

homb caperiments. Wind patterns

during these large tests blew penerally
from cast to west. which would have cartied bailout over the Marshalls. dr took

National Academy of Sciences 1s pre-

paring a study on the potential hazards

FANGATAUFA

/~—"\

1980 reported inconsistencies in government safety standards. “Standing on
any part of Runit Island.” said one
reporter, “you must wear rubber boots
and a face mask to prevent breathing
plutonium particles. But standing on the
concrete dome [a mere fifteen leet away]
you are not requtred to wear anyprolective gear at all.” Moreover, according to
sources in Washington, D.C., the

approximately ten years after exposure

in 1954 for the thyroid disease and
cancers to begin showing up on
Rongelap and Utirtk. Many people on
other atolls say their health began to
deteriorate during the 1970s, pointing to
a possible relationship with exposure

from the Chnstmas and Johnston

Islands bomb tests. Unlike at Rongelup
and Utirik. however, there is no medical
program to monitor and treat these

populations.

Following a three-year, $100 million-

of leaks that have developed inthe dome

on Runit. A Department of Energyscientific team has been dispatched to
reevajuate the hazards, say the sources.

Amid the atmosphere of uncertainty,

the 450 Enewetak people are returning
home, alter living in exile for thirty
years on tiny Lyelang Atoll. Runit wall
be off limits to the Enewetakese, but
islands within three miles of it have been
designaied by the governmentassafe for
“picnics and food gathering.” A
Marshallese asked, “What will happen if
birds, crabs. turtles, and other animals
land on off-limits islands and are eaten

by peopie?”
US. scientists say that the Enewetak
cleanup benefited from the many muistakes made at the expense of the

Bikinians during the ill-conceived
attempt to resettle Bikini during the

1970s. In £969 the Atomic Energy Commission had said: “The exposure to radiation of the Bikim people does not otfer
a significant threat to their health and
Safety.”

As early as 1975, however. the “pres-

plus nuclear cleanup of Enewetak, the

enceot low levels of plutonium”wasdiscovered in the urine of the more than

people to return to certain islands. The

this was not considered “radiologically

possible for people to return safely to the

Lawrence Livermore Laboratory repon
described Bikini as “possibly the best

U.S. government sass it is safe for the

government is trying to prove at Enewetak what itcouldn't at Bikini that itis

site of forty-three nuclear weapons
tests. But a great dealof controversyhas
developed over whether or not anyof

the islands are safe. Nevertheless. onthe

basis of a scientific study (which has

been questioned) and the overwhelming

desire to go home, the Enewetak peo-

ple recently voted to return to their
islands.
During the massive cleanup operation, thousands of cubic yards of plu-

tonmium-contaminated soil were scraped
off the islands and. with other radioactive debris. encased in a mussive

100 people who had moved hack, but

significant” by the government. (A 1976

available source of data for evaluating

the transfer of plutonium across the gut
wall after being incorporated into biological systems.") An elevenfold
increase in radioactive cesium was
recorded in 1977, but still there were no
plans to remove the people from a
havardous environment. However, in
1978, the US. was in the embarrassing

situation of having to relocate the peo-

ple once again, as they had ingested the
largest measurable dose of plutonium of
any population.
Of Enewetak, the U.S. government
The New Pacific—- 17

Select target paragraph3