MATHEMATICAL AIDS IN THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE
BIOLOGICAL HAZARDS OF RESIDUAL RADIATION
By Lt. Col. James T. Brennan, MC
Walter Reed Army Medical Center
Tn attempting to cope with radiation hazard

problems, many a biologist has, like the writer,
found that a meager working knowledge of
mathematics places a frustrating upper limit on
one’s insight into many important situations.
The mathematical treatmont of the idealized

contaminated plane surface is an example of
this difficulty, A reference which is commonly
cited in this connection is “Effects of Atomic
Weapons,” page 432 ff. The treatment given
therein is by and for mathematicians, and as
such is beyond most biologists and nearly all
physicians. In 1951 C.S. Maupin [1] developed

\
\

an expénded version of the analysis which appears useful in that it might significantly

/

inercase the number of biologists who can

ar -7

follow the derivation, This expanded version
has not heretofore been published and is shown
below (see fig. 1).

Consider a point P at a height 2 above a
uniformly contaminated circular disk of radius
a. Let the concentration of radioactivity be
such that there are k photons, each of m (Mev)
energy emitted (equally in all directions) per

em? of surface. Then the number of Mev
emitted from the infinitesimal area rdrdé@ is
kmrdrdé. The number of Mev reaching point
P per unit time from this small area will be

dene “VFhidrag

det

where » is the total narrow beam absorption
coefficient in air for photons of energy m.
From this point on, no attempt is made to
follow the fate of scattered photons. Ultimately
this causes the estimate of dose at point P to be

/

‘ee me cee
Friawre 1.

low (30 percent low when 4=6 meters, 10 percent low when h==1 meter). But to return to
the analysis, the energy flow reaching P from
the entire disk will be

__km

7 ft reneee

Soe oe
Integrating with respect to 8,

25, rh
Conversion to dose in roentgens at point P

may be made at any time by means of simple
assumptions such as that one roentgen is delivered by a flux of 10° photons/em?,
127

Select target paragraph3