at Bikini Atol] allows comparison of the predicted doses at the two atolls. The predicted doses at each atoll] are of course based upon assumptions concerning the time sequence of availability of key food products as outlined in the respective assessments. The predicted dose for the living pattern using Bikini Island for residence and for agricultural products exceeds any predicted for Enewetak, primarily because key food products will be available on a much shorter time scale. The doses predicted for the primary living patterns at the two atolls are listed in Table 33. The highest predicted doses occur for the living pattern involving Bikini Island, Case 6, at Bikini Atoll. The integral 30 year whole body and bone marrow doses and 29 and 43 rem respectively. The predicted doses are approximately 2.5 times higher than those predicted for Engebi Island at Enewetak Atoll (whole body 11 rem, bone marrow 16 rem) which is the living pattern leading to the second highest predicted doses at the atolls. Eneu Island, Case 1, at Bikint Atoll ranks third in the list of four major living patterns at the two atolls. The whole body dose of 5.0 rem and bone marrow dose of 6.6 rem for Eneu are approximately a factor of two lower than those predicted for Engebi Island at Enewetak Atoll. However the Eneu doses are about five times higher than the southern island living patterns at Enewetak. The southern island living patterns at Enewetak lead to the lowest predicted doses of all living patterns at either atoll (1.0 rem whole body, 1.2 rem bone marrow), and are in fact lower than U.S. doses. Bone doses presented in the Enewetak Radiological Survey (1) were 9009905 a = }> #’ J -30-