TPESORT pee we me wee } control patient gave a history us syphilis for which she had been treated twice. Interval histories were essentially negative. No deaths had occurred in the exposed population, and three apparently healthy infants had been born in the interim period. Their tn ufero ages at the time of exposure were approximately 3, 6, and 7 months. Three other pregnancies were noted during the present examinations, in one of which conception had occurred at about the time of exposure and in the remaining two, 2 to 4 months after exposure. . TABLE 2.1—-Positive Findings on Physical Examination .? J of Exposed and Control Populations Diagnosis Cardiovascular system: Generalized arteriosclerosis with heart disease Bypertension with heart disease . Luetic heart disease (7?) No. of exposed group No, of Rita control group 1 i 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 2 1 1 Heart disease, etiology unknown Arthritis: Hypertrophic Rheumatic Parkinsonism Diabetes mellitus Gynecological system: Pregnancy 0 0 1 z 0 1 Cervical cyst Cervical polyp Urethral curuncle Furuncle of labium Syphilis (clinical diagnosis), activity (7) Tuberculosis, pulmonary, arrested Leprosy, arrested (?) oO 0 2 1 Q 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 1 Qo Bronchitis Otitis externa 6 1 1 0 Pyorrhea 7 2 Cervical erosion 1 Impetigo 7 6 Otitis media ' . ‘. 1 0 Hernia, ingvinal, direct . 1 0 Blindness, traumatic ° 1 1 3 Fibromyoma of uterus (7) . . i 0 1 Table 2.1 summarizes the principal findings from history and physical examinations, and additional data on individuals are given in Appendices A and B. Dermatological findings are reported in detail in Chap. dence between exposed and ported in Chap, 3, could be both populations during the 3, There appeared to be no significant difference in disease iacicontrol populations, and no findings, with the exception of those reascribed to radiation effects. A measles epidemic, in progress in examinations, had begun to decline in the control group but was ° still at its peak in the exposed group at the completion of this study. The time interval between the peak incidence of measles in the two populations was probably due to the relative isolation of the exposed group. Body weights of the exposed patients were compared with their weights in March, 1954. Although there were a few instances of significant weight loss in individuals, the over-all popu- - 12 ~ one seeds? ecm