SECRET - 142° MSiLIs Table 2,51-1 gives the station mmber, slant distance to the device, end the neutrons per om? as measured by eact. of the warious detectors. Table 2.5l-2 gives the station number, slant distance, and the neutron dose in rep as measured by the USAP Schoc) of Aviation Medicine's chea— Seal dosimeters. Table 2.51-3 gives the station number, slant distance, and gamma dose for those DT6C glass doaimrtors wich could be read here in PPG, The remaining “T&C's had to b- returned to the ZI for reading due to the high dose rates, The AFC chenica] dosimeter and germanius dosimeter data are nct availatie at this time, Pig. 2.51-1, 7, 3, and 4 are plots o” neutron flux times slant distence scuared ws sient distance “or Pu, Np, U, and S respectively. Pig. 2.51-5 18 a plet of neutron ‘lux tires slant distance vs slant distance for sold. The Bp graph essumd that there is no spectral variation along the instrument line, tre line being drewn parallel to the Pu and U included in the resecoetiwe lirsa. The Bp point on the 64° line has peen adjusted upward tc compensate for the arparent perturbation of the tower, Fig. 7.51-6 is a plot of dosr ‘n rep tines slant distance squared ws slant distance as rras..red bt the USAF chemical dosimeters and tke neutron “%o1l wn BEST AVAILASLE COPY CONCLOST The lof this device can easily be detected frogs the graphs. The reagon for the change in slope of the 45° line is net clear, It may be seen that the dese as reasmad by the chemical dosimeters is low by a factor of thres to five ae compared to that measured by the foil system, This discreparcy is not iraniieatcly explaineble. It is anticipated that upon recalibration of toth syeteme and comparison with AEC dosimeters this discrepancy will be resolved. -19 SECRET (7 @