for a specific badge, the exposure of the film badge during the period it was in the mess hall (H+28.75 to H+35.25) must be added to the calculated film badge dose as of H+28.75 hours. This "mess hall dose" is approximately 12 rem. From the personnel interviews it is possible to calculate the H+28.75 film badge dose for two of the film badges whose readings are given in Table 2 (badge #311 and #312). In addition, it is passible to calculate the H+28.75 hour dose for the badge that was hung on the tent post in the Army area (badge #314). Table 3 compares the calculated film badge dose at H+35.25 hours (the calculated dose at H+28.75 hours plus the "mess hall dose") and the corresponding film badge reading (from Table 2) for these three film badges. The activity scenarios or protection factors pertinent to the other badges are insufficiently known to permit meaningful comparisons. eT cae Table 3. Comparison of Kosimetry results with doses Calculated q film badges. ef Film Calculated Dose Badge CN 311 416 32 rem 312 4i] 38 314 N/A 100 Calculated Dose (QH+28.75 hrs (QH+35.25 hrs . Film Badge Reading(Table 2) Ratio 44 rem 40 rem 1.10 50 44 1.14 112 98 1.14 From Table 3, the calculated dose to a specific film badge at H+35.25 hours is approximately 10-14 percent higher than the actual film badge reading. This difference between the calculated doses and the film badge readings could easily be accounted for in the uncertainties associated with defining the free-field radiation environment and protection factors on Rongerik. Thus, the estimated doses in Table | fare conservatively reduced by 10 percent in order'to be consistent with the dosimetry results. This adjustment in the Table 1] doses yields the best estimates of film badge doses received by the personne! on Rongerik. Results are presented in Section 5. it Bo bye bee _& \ I ce te thie Ptfour a ake, /. hy - 3 ‘ Jr be eee | : : . mete fr Cotas pore ys Tha. 15 aed fare pee bate ‘de tos .f i , np tetdechen | . d “ey Al