es
.
=
_.
/
OP
ar
|
my
7
a
.
rr:
7
x
ee
:
phre,
.
.
—
]
=
-
p
;
documan! consists
f
.
:
‘of Penne
-
:
Pageg
n aes oeie Saris
o
A
-
:
:
pe, dein 0, Bugher, WB,,Divecter9 PETS“amee
Division of Biology and Medicine
‘
ot
.
+ tendon My Daming,Wealth Thysicist..
Biophysies Branch, Division ef MologyandMetieime”
1%
|” yyreppReraTrow OF URIMALTSES youPU YW RONORLAPNATIVES
Sob,ip
aan.a0
This is a follow-up to your request for interpretation of Po data a &
i
Rongelap natives contained in the attached paper.
Aecording to LASL research, the relationships between Pa exeretioa, |
bedy burden, ani tine after exposure may be expressed in the equation
Ue 0.23 tel
4
ars.
’
7 ‘
A
f
- 4 COGROINATE WITH:
}
fF
CANCELLED
~16 CLASSIFED INFO BRACKETED
any TIE I? pe
ene
cer
Law = ein
. She wan yutasibleboty byrden 7Teccumersiod wy,Handbook eofor Cos
ve
aot
.
ar
~
“op
“¥
we
ae —~
pets
o
-
ao
°
2
t 2, 4
ays
watUwe
mixin permissible body burdens
Pieyeliantiity-of the dita singe Lt iswniikely, for,
}
we?
-
serene
.
.
ne s
- : ;
-ng doMned"os )
“ToDo
c
rrr
>
ao
<tiB =
PT ee
TZ.= a
oe],
.
i ar
i
—
|
‘ghd Heie
:
+
|
oO
Erter'ty's tater of 300on fro mconstve days
amen
_DATE >
we nt:
patient Kotado would have expretionrates of Pa tat ioe
na Seba
to teDre‘Barley,“NFO. (.5.37078)
Form AEC-818
.
.
-
.
Three of the readings on the attached data sheet are at or above
- Reds value, However, there appears t me to be uncertainty con
afos
.
a
1.5
“3
SP |
"easds
|
|
|
urine was 1.5 liters/dey, then
\TLON 1 CIRCLE NUMBER(S}
Of
1, CLASSIFICATHON RETAINE
2. CLASSIFICATION. CHANGED TO:
3. CONTAINS NO OOF CLASSIFIED INFO -.
74
| on‘the olithtay, the percentage of excretion would have‘been tout
0,02 of the ingested dose, ne that the rate of exeretion ef .
“would gorrespond to
7
+ ARIE
a AE
Be
#8“Sine after ingestion, 2
.
—
|
to
aoe
v
.
'
‘
aa
we
os
1mwink eeration par day 1a parcetaceof
wheres
nt a
wa
-
.
el
ek,
.
.
vy
a ot
02” - of a.
ir
ye we
alpen...
ed
ae
o7
.
tate.
at.
ae. coVenereieritayte OFFICE ~ -16—O2761-2
a
i.
a
{ 5.
378
’
r
,
pr
:
.
:&
:
~"
i.
J