Muckle June 28, 1988 -2- When reviewed with a bit of perspective, including bearing local conditions in mind, and the fact that 1982-86 counting techniques differed from earlier ones, I don't believe one can say that this collection of counts eStablishes anything specific in a positive sense. What do you think now? I feel somewhat hesitant to involve you in all of this, since it takes time. However, I excuse myself with the thought that you were involved already. Sincerely yours, Nese F.Nirhe Henry I. Kohn cc: Dr. Rosalie Bertell Over 91 for Blood Count Table