4.4

Infant Dosage

The doses that have been under consideration are for adults. In the
case of childrenand infants, the doses might be different owing to
variations in (1) physical and physiclogical processes and (2) dust and

diet.

Physical and physiological factors.
These variables affect the
conversion factors in Tables 4.2 #1A & #1B. For example, the smaller
size of children can diminish the fraction of gamma ray energy absorbed
in the body;
the residence time of the radionuclide in the body may be
less than in adults; the fraction absorbed from the gut might be much
more. Furthermore, a long-lived radionuclide deposited in the body at age
6 months will be diluted by growth so that its "picocuries per gram of
tissue", on which a dose depends, will fall significantly with time.
Table 4.4 #1, based on the United Kingdom NRPB report (19%17b ), and
consistent with the recommendations of the ICRP (International Commission
on Radiological Protection), shows that the corrections for children are
well on their way to disappearing by age 10 y, but are important in the
first year or so of life. The correction for cesium-137 is an increase
of not more than 20%, but that for strontium is about 3.6-fold. For the
transuranics, it is 2.4-fold for inhalation during the first year, but
for ingestion it is 22-fold for months 0-6, and 2.1-fold thereafter in
that year.

These factors are for committed doses which in the case of children
aged 10 and less are calculated to age 70 years rather than for the
standarized period of 50 years in adults. For radionuclides with short
physiological half-lives such as cesium-137 (less than 110 days), this is
of no consequence. But for the transuranics with half-lives in liver and
bone marrow of 20 and 50 years, respectively, the extra residence time
adds to the 50-year committed dose.
In general, it would be expected that the smaller intake of
children and infants will compensate for the increased size of their
dose-factors compared to the adult ones in Tables 4.2 #1A & #1B.
Since there are almost no directly pertinent Rongelap data on such
inputs, we have approached the problem in two ways. First, we have made
some calculations aimed at setting upper bounds.
Second, we have attempted to obtain information from the
Marshall Islands on infant and small child diets.

35

Select target paragraph3