.
:
106
pally of three radioisotopes, Ry19 | nytS and its daughter Rh-~~,

The data

and calculations in appendix H also strongly indicate that a single fallout
particle could produce a recognizable erythema.

Lon! auinatioofClothrz
In the cese of contamination ef clething, higher dose rates might te
This was exemplified in

tolerated than those for exposed parts of the body,

the natives where no beta burns were observed under clothing of the most
highly contaminated personnel.

(This does not include such areas as under

the waist line where materiel apparently collected end was held in place.)

On the other hand, very large increases in contaminetion should not be tclerated since it is possible for the clothing to be rearroenged so as to bring
the contaminated surface in contact with the sxin.

Further, it is not

unlikely that one may rub his hands over his clothing and then through the
hair where the material could be held in place for relatively long periods
of time.

PateExnosureto theVornds
A further consideration is the beta dose to the hands resulting from

hendling objects contaminated with fallout material.

Although some data are

available on bete burns from handling radioactive objects, the conditicns
are so different from those associated with fallout that comparisons prob-

ably would not be valid.*
If the above assumptions and calculations are correct concerning con-

tamination of a general area from fallout, then the transfer of all the
radioactive material to the hands from an object of equal area would not
constitute a hazard.
object

Thus, one might consider using as criteria for moni—
ose

edin

*"Beta Ray Burns of Human Skin".

iv

abov

0

Knowlton, et al.

Medical
American
Association,
V. 141, No. 4.
- 37 -

Pane ee eeee oe Be

oni

n

onnel

Journal

Sept. 24, 1949.

Select target paragraph3