are still somewhat in
Since routine radiochemical assay procedures for curium

most feasible analytithe development stage, gamma counting was considered the
cal technique for this experiment.

Curium concentrations in the sample material

rays of
were, therefore, determined by counting the 228 and 278 keV gamma
er.
curium-243 using a NaI(T1l) detector and pulse height analyz

nties
Overall measurement error was assessed by considering potential uncertai
was
detector
The NaI(T1)
in each step of the sampling and analytical scheme.
were
Checks
.
energy-calibrated with appropriate gamma-ray emitting nuclides
also made for gain shifts and changes in efficiency after every 10 samples

with an aliquot of the dosing solution.

Backgrounds were taken before, during,

and after a series of counts to confirm that contamination of the counting
To establish differences in counting variability
chamber had not occurred.
between sample types (milk, urine, feces, etc.) and the administered dose,

"spiked" samples of each type were prepared in triplicate and assayed.

These

"spiked" samples were recounted after a period of time to determine any time-reThroughout the
lated variations due to the settling out of sample material.
Tissue samples were
experiment, multiple samples were collected for analysis.

not homogenized but are being counted twice

(top-bottom rotation).

The vari-

ability between these two tissue counts will be used in the overall assessment
of those uncertainties not associated with analytical hardware and counting
duration.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

All samples collected during this study have been analyzed at least once, but
because of a few very low curium concentrations, a portion of the samples are
being recounted (1,000-minute counts).
Furthermore, to determine the feasibility of radiochemical assays, selected animal tissues and some metabolic

(urine, milk, etc.) samples will be prepared for analysis by an outside labora-

tory.
As a result, data reported below
they do provide significant information
administered curium.
Considerably more
transport of intravenously administered

are not totally comprehensive, but
on the caprine absorption of orally
information is given on the biological
curium.

Experimental data were initially calculated as the curium concentration per
gram of sample.
For milk, urine, and fecal samples, the concentration per

gram of sample was multiplied by the respective total daily output (weight) of
these substances. Results for the intravenously dosed goats are presented as
a percentage of administered dose per total collection (Table 2) and as a

percentage of dose per kg of material (Table 3).

In the case of the orally dosed goats, approximately 99 percent of the dose
was recovered in the feces; the majority of milk, urine, and blood samples had
no detectable curium concentrations.
Curium concentrations in the feces from
these orally dosed goats were relatively high from 24 to 96 hours after dosing.

The greatest curium output occurred in the feces at the 48-hour collection
period.

171

Select target paragraph3