RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Plutonium Concentration in the Soils

The concentrations of plutonium in the less than 2-mm soil particles are given

In the desert pavement, approximately 95% of the activity is
in Table 1.
The remaining 5% is distributed in the
0 - 2.5 cm surface layer.
the
found in
lower horizons with indications of a higher concentration in the 7.5 - 10 cm
By comparison, the 0 - 2.5 cm
layer than in the two intermediate layers.

surface layer of the desert mound contains about 60% of the activity with 30%
and 7% contributions in the 2.5 - 5.0 and 5.0 - 7.5 cm layers, respectively.

This distribution would suggest a sizable buildup of the mound subsequent to
the detonation event.
However, this interpretation regarding buildup should
be reviewed with caution since the observed distribution may be a reflection
of the sampling technique used.

In sampling the mound, the layers were separated at 2.5-cm increments; the 0
level was measured from the higher elevation point of the mound along the
sampling slope.
This point is illustrated in Figure 1, a schematic representation of a desert mound.
The first increment of 2.5 cm then represents the

depth measured from the highest point (0 level) on the mound.

At lower sections

of the mound, the depth of penetration would be less than 2.5 cm, depending on
the slope.
Sampling in this manner evidently resulted in a lower mass of
sample from the surface layer since the gross weight of this sample was 233
grams in the 0 - 2.5 cm layer as compared with a mean weight of 315 + 3.6
grams for the 2.5 increments of the three lower layers.

If one assumes that the buildup of the mound was relatively even, then sampling

the mound perpendicular to the sloping surface (Fig. 1) rather than perpendicular to the ground level might better reflect the depth distribution.
Assuming that 315 grams represent the mass of soil 10 cm x 10 cm x 2.5 cm
(sampling dimensions),

then 233 grams represent 74% of the mass based on 250 em,

Thus, approximately 26% of the 0 - 2.5 cm layer may be present in the 2.5 5.0 cm layer. If this 26% contributed the same activity to the 2.5 - 5.0 cm
layer as found in the surface layer, then the calculated activity in the
remaining portion or the 2.5 - 5.0 cm layer would be 5250 dpm/g compared to

the measured 7492 dpm/g. Similar calculations of the 5.0 - 7.5 cm layer show
that the activity of this layer would be 392 dpm/g compared to the measured
1655 dpm/g; and the 7.5 - 10.0 cm layer would be 97 compared to 174 dpm/g.
If the distribution occurred in the manner postulated above,

then the calculated

results of plutonium distribution would suggest that a small amount existed
prior to detonation.

It appears worthwhile to sample desert mounds by both

methods as well as at different locations around the shrubbery to establish
the activity distribution and activity buildup beneath the shrubbery.

Select target paragraph3