Nagasaki only to have his work ingerrupted by the Secupatioa.
fe

investigators who undertook’ their own atudies, Dr, Teuzuki:%:;

seemed to accept my’ assurances that in the present Situation,

it was the intent of the American scientists to assist the--.:7:
Japanese and that all of our findings would be availabe to 4°."

~,

then andcould be used as they! saw fitin‘their,“own publications.oan
cenTete
RS
:
mt)

wate

.

<5’:
aUEeeyet 2: Jr 40

-

‘Dr. Tsuzuki was “utwardly ‘trtenaly.‘to both’‘Dr,. Norton.and

myself until the time of his departure, for Geneva, ‘onMarch 31,°.

Despite this, the lackof cooperationcontinued to be “manifest :
on the part of the Japanese investigators,’. I do not “know ~.

whether this was because. we mis judged Dr, Tsuzuki's friendli-:-

ness, or because he jacked influence onhis _Japanese| colleagues.

oe

~

‘

. (2) There via much’‘evidence bf rivalry, among”“Various.

Japanese medical groups;,. In ‘particular, thestaff at, Tokyo:

- University, headed byDr, Tsuzuki; “were ‘anitially -at. “odds wathSs

the groupat the, National Institute of Health, headed by:“Dri
Kobayashi. Moreover, the local’physicians’ at. Yaizu,; where“‘all:
wg npbut twoof the’ patients”were hospitalized’ until March 29," vere
..
anxiousfor. various rezsons_ that thepatients remain there. iis
been motivated. by, their. Kncwledge_ that the Americans.“advised:

that the “patients,be
transfered to.-TOKyO, TE
Deeeenee Mees:
~
yt2
=

ta

a

ewe SF

7f

ae

Aa

—_—

2

al

ton in

oa Oe rate

.

=

45
'

il re

ie

“es oe

©

ee mA

(3): Many,”“of.“the:‘acceptedprocedures,of.“modern, ‘American:

medical practice’ Seemed strange to theJapanese,and their’Done cepts are Btrange tous,

For exemple, access to. patients by.

any physicians was denied for several days because the. Japanese:

—_-

physicians found their patients to be ina highly excited state

and preferred not to disturb them, Japanese physicians indi-*- i"
ceted on several occasions that the taking of duplicate blood --

simears by Japanese and. American investigators was an’ unneces>24

sary duplication, énd an “ordeal thatthe patients” shouldnot“per
~~

mk
expected to. undergo, - eenora
Seeger!
Ta
TES
eet
~~
OL
a2 25
>
De
wow
eleSe
¥,
Ay 2 ra
oy
Te X
a
a
- r- ~~
.
owt
=

a

..

-

-

-

we
2
7

In my‘Anitial, ‘conference with the Japznese scientists I:
was forced to the conclusicn tnat they were not well eauipzsed
to Geal properly with the radiological aspects of the probien,

-

For example:

.

4

:

=

-

~
ear.
a
-

.Le

7

.

-

7”

oO

.

mg
vo.
.

.

x

ie “CRUSE anew Ving of boxb ves involved, the orcblem 4tself was @rew cne, and tnet unless they }mew &11 about tne bomb, they
eculd evaluate neither the injury to the fishermen nor the esrect
of long-range conténination of Japan and its fishing crews throughcut

the Facific.

(2) They were quick to identify qualitatively scre of the

recioactive isotopes in the ash end irmedietely concluced that
cerceition of these radioisotopes in the tissues of the rmen'wKas

the prime factor in their redicél status,

Tnis decision was -

reached without _benefit_ of radicchemical urine énalyses of thes yee
patients,~ This]procedure “which"as beyond, the’ capabilityOf: 42 Clit

their laboratories is of “Coursea prerequisite to understending-“- OSs
the enount, and ‘kind of fission“product absorption that actually- | =le

t

occurred, DOF 2 22eeaS
net

a

Siyee ae re ‘
7

-

7

a

3

.

:

;

0

-

ate! .
ve

xt Witt ae Depts
SER, ; a

Doe’
ARCH,—

21S
7 jie atte:‘jena os ae ay

hletgurtoateTenal

Select target paragraph3