Dr. Lewis ‘belteves ‘that. theyYaapantndatered“EDTA.aS ‘the patlente:s despite the fact that” urine analysis ‘was . beyond ‘their’‘capability’? 733 and they were therefore’ unable’to determine: either theneed for. = EDTA or the effect produced by it, Apart from the,factthat ‘they were unable to undertake urine analysisat that time, it, 1s also:. evident that they did not understand the’ dynamics of: fission: =."af product metabolismand were ‘not used to. thinking”, in terms:lof:eae, urinary excretion levels: as “an Andex.of, absorptionnd,deposition: ate "S09 They,‘were anxious “to.‘provide me!with" samples”“of ”‘urine for: a State-side “analysis. Two aamples_ were, ‘delivered ZonMarch|26 ‘and A wot, five more on March 30,- As yetwe.“have.“not”“received “samples. from: oT the remaining 16 ‘patients,. The”samples” received were properly: : forwarded to the Health and Safety Laboratory’ and I have had the.“< results of ‘gross analysis of the firsttyo samples .:. I ecriritinica ted these resuits to Dr Kobayasht in’«the attached letter,nich | igs : self-~explahaterys