cous membranes from improperly prepared arrow:
rout Jour is not uncommon, Both have erroncously
been associated with radiation elfccis in the minds
of the Rongelap people.
Diabetes mellivus is a major problemand is discussed separately in Section TEL. G.
A prograin is under way to build newdispensaries on the outer islands. On Ebeye a new hospi
tal building has provided improved conditions lor
health care.

Lt is against this general back ground that our

examinations tke place. We are privileged to get

generous help fronthe local healed authorities in

our task, and conversely when we are an the scene
we Cannot avoid getting invelycd in problernis out.
side the scape of Lillout complications,
Major physical findings during the past 3 years
are listed in “Fable 8,
B. VITAL STATISTICS: FERTILITY AND MORTALITY

Vhe number of five births duriy the last 5-vear

period was 37 among the exposed and 69 among the
unex posed, Calculated as live births per vear per
1000 population these numbers give a birthrate of

Pil for the exposed and 106 for the unespascd. Ta
addition, (here were LO miscariiages amang the

exposceb and 1 among the unes posed, so dat, in
both qroups, ane premnaney out of five cuded in

nicarciaae, Uhis is approximately the same free

queneyos observed in the past (sce Viable 9),
Lewal abortions are net performed ithe Mare
shiall Usbands, and there is no reason to believe that
any ofthe pregnaney terminations on recard were

provoked. Family plaaning has net been practiced
inh the past although ti is stowly gaining ground,

We therelore believe that the leriliiy and fetus
Viability indicated by these statis ics are the natue
ralones. and, aldiough the exposed females showed
aN apparent increase in miscarriages during the
first > vears, there is no evidence sudgesting that

the histary of esposure to radiation bas had any

permanent clfect on cither.
The people who have died ace listed by vear in
Table 10, with their age and: probable caus of
death (such death certificates ay aie available are

hot alwaws specilig). The overall mortility rate for
the 20-sear periad is ~b2 per L000 per vear for
the exposcd Rongelap group and — 35 for the anexposed: for the hist d-vear period the rates are

~Y andl ~ 21 respeetively. These ditlcrences are
hot statinically significant; ta such small groupes

Table It

Mortality, Utirik
(Av. age at death: 6123)
Year
bob

157

Subject
Nu,

TB

1057

Age

& wx

Year

aM
57 F

63M

Subject

Age

Na.

& ex

1905

218)

o7 M

1965

22d

63 F

1905

2

TLE

14657

2

63 F

yD

W255

56M

1058

wd

NE

147

2181

7K AM

hoo

2he2

u7 M

La7

2202

“OF

954

227

TaN

Tm?

way

T9F

yo
Ta

JEU
SyuT

4N1
61F

18
| Seeadd

2tul
wit

2M
TUM

Badd
lk
19aG

2116
Ou
J1ho

i
JF
ith Mf

14d
1 theads
my

2141
2259
219]

a7 F
JF
oF

taal

NG

TEN

td

T34

8OM

1G]

2yuu

4OF

1070

275

YK

63M

Vad
Tod

Jyh
Ti

t3 NE
65 F

buT]
971

W238
Th

oe M
2F

1d

2192

uiF

63 MM

[72

rH

2178

37M

Lad

JU3A

51 F

Los

21a

o7 F

174

2201

as F

ons

14653

rad

2104

TF

IG7U

Lor.

73M

57 MM

observed over such short periods, differences this
large or larver could occur by chance ( <U.05).

Even so, had the trend been in the opposite dircetion, we would have had reason to be concerned;

a an cxample, we ary keeping a carchul watch on the

BpPpAarent increase in maligasncies (see Section V’).
The mortality rate among the exposed Cririk
people was ~ 13 for the 20-vear period and ~ 14
lor the last 5 vears. The deaths are sted in Table
TE, bat causes are not given because of insullicient

hata.
Reeent misconceptions make it necessary to

clarify comparisons with district-wide statistics.
The vital statistics of the Trast Territory have improved greatly over the 20 vears covered bythese
reports, bur thes are still tat published in suthicient detail to permit valid comparisons with ours,

Vhe age distributions are tou ditverent: district-

wide the median age is 1G vears, whereas in our
group itis benweren $0 and 40, Vhe ditference between the mortality ia the general population (+7

per [000 per vear) and thaton our groups (> 3)

reflects this ditference un age distrabution andi is

not related ty the history of exposure. A similar ef

lect can be seen on the birthrate (~40 per 1000
per vear distriet-wide and ~~ EIU in our groups).

Select target paragraph3