” tiis was calculated to give gust response of apprer h O-E5 percent c- zisn limit on the wings. d early and 10 feet to left of course at T o? errival,. 2. Altitude was 15,190 feet, Parley - The planned position of Barley was on an in-bound heading of C50°T with a horizontal offset of 22,200 fcet left of ground zero, fest abreast of ground zero at H # 19 seconds. 3.25 se conds to be 15,100 Actual posit ion on shot day was early and 640 feet left of course at Ty 1.15 seconds carly aml 430 feet to left of course at shock arrival, altitude was 10,180 feet, PESULTS. ee 1. There was no apparent aircraft or instrunentation danzse to ene eine aaa vat. 2. Deta obtained: a. Weiter received an eyrip.zcsure of 9,2 vst, “tived for the positioning yield. pircent of desicn limit. tuition of wing fuel is ‘the critical wing bends‘rg A refined value will te detercined, .7. Since alurtrun °s 1,0 psi we .vailable when the skin tempsiatues vis y.t- aS Jay 20 coach « idcrs -l- 2 of prinary importance in this shot, it was not reduced as priority data in the Field. b “arley was deprived of cLtaining 50 percent of its deta Cre to cls vieording speed of one of its two 5O-chanrel cscillozrephs being set et one inch rer second. This miss~setting csused the traces to be jursbled up to the Lat deta reduction was virtually isypecsible., iss-settings such as this in the future. - 50- Sisps e.tsnt have been tzehksn to pir. cat