»

eat

NN

:

|
:

fete]

‘

2

2

ety

73

sae

oy

»

‘
rye

EN gs

t

Lk

4,

taf
tgeee

Moa,

t

aN

oe he nt 4 Me 2D

“YATps

.
ao.

RAE Se ie be

x
4o16d?

.

ts

‘if

'

SOL Ue
Motte

CAML

HILL

SAL? AN

TAARLARLA

Tat Alas

Oofun

rong
1

OF 26;

OF26/U7 43

4

Torus 724

Tee

5 ROR hee emma EREak ew eh ee eeee ee eeee en

,

5

aes bia
“wee

ays

,

t

yy

t

\

y

LT

July 30, L976

pane

eae Sa

ry

a

woe

DENT

YT. Qeorjn
COTO

Bobo

rst

co

ist

PALS OST RET
Roe rep Trectuohl

POMAPE DIS CFC"
rnios fer
Gaikey
Utter

Dr. Rovers A.

Conard

Medic) Deporunene

Brookliven National, Lavpora tory
Upton, lew York LOTS
Mear Th

ee ee nee ae ee es ere

AGVOYEAL LO OOS bial)

Sne purpose of this letter is to refer you to a
Letter dated July 9, 1976, > from the veonle
of Utirik
Bor
to
hr *
Roger TT
Ray of BRDA at the levade Oreorations at
Offilee,
We would nitso Lik a awe make
arlier letver fro Keprese abive
to you following the March survey,
To
not received a rcesponec,
Furthermore,
Balos' letter dated Magy 5, LOTG to vou hay oot be
nswered.
Consequently, we Should like to nos
questions, and seek some clarifications vith resard
to the Rongelap-Utirit: issuc.
~

wf

:

.

eo

ev

a

lithweni

blenry

MATEAMAS DISTRICT
trea Guerpaie
Herman Patacias

We ven’ therefore, appreciate learning of
responses

to the

antoacives Wno irate the
;

and.‘also. wnat respunse to the Uti
sent by cither you or by Mr. Roser Rav.

Qseer Pasa

Ataji Sales

Carrean Gigtoe

which said eneat no "descendants" of exposed »

Chatteg Ceanniat

would roecive I.D.

“|e
Teste) Sal

amended by PL,

wot aes.

Pash INGE YT

Satyee a Basitius
say

la
age
toe.
Motgwu
Mohan

Saetore Coo fiat
Qe

ret!
.

"tp pe ee

Daygy

Oey Me ces
s
ue
UP
BRT
eta
"
°
_

op snopes
:

1

Furthermore, We have heard that people af
and Utirik have complained that it was our

‘

1

’

ilo.

cards.
5-80,

Public Law no.

0-52,

indicates that descendants

are covered unter tue law.
Jlowever, tne benerits are
accorded to the people under the 'PIPL-SPyA anreenent.
Those whe would receive cards, would ne those Listed
- ine
“FOAM,
7
Weal
on the BNL roster.
Furthermore, we recad thet
include:
wo
position was that: there was no reason
”~
descendants
of exposed persons on
tre Bi rester 190%
.
SWO reasons: * a)
it was unlikely that anv effects
would bo transmitted to subsequent generasions, and
2
putting
then
1
i them on the roster and thus giving
i
I.D. cards would Lead them to bellicve treat herr
fell into the some cossage class as the exznosed
Rongelapesc.
—
-

ee ee ee ee

MARSHALLS DISTRICT

BEST COPYAVAILABLE

ryt

rhe ft

tea HE rile! hatte
‘

8

Heer i bas

Terayy

.

Me Melis SP ees Nrer# detache Tee teeter ict eet TE A TEIee, tame ee ee Greemen R DeeREUTIRES BS CUE De Dk gt tad het METAR EE
eee

nee ek toe a a mle

ee

Ot

~~

gree

Select target paragraph3