rate from the equation.
This method yields n-i estimates of Ky where n was
the number of data points.
An average value of Kk was assigned for each nm
clide, and the results for the Rongelap and Utirik populations are given in
Table 3.
For the evaluation of KE from Eq. 1 and 2, radiological and
physiological parameters were obtained from the open literature (ICRP59, [CK!'68,
ICRP69, ICRP79, Ki78).
A representative sample cf these parameters is preseuted
in Table 4,
Table 3
Summary of Dietary Rate Constants (Kes aot)
60,
90,
65,
oe
1.8107
3.1x107*
st xo
Females
1.6x30>
4 ixlO™
3,.5el07®
Lx
Adults
15x10"?
_1,9x107
3.1xlo >
L.4xl0™
Males
N.D.
4.6x107
N.D.
L.axio”
Females
N.D.
40x10"
N.D.
14x07"
Adults
N.D.
4.2xl0"
N.D.
Le4x}Q”
Utirik Adults
N.D. = No data sufficient for analysis.
The values of K.
Rongelap and Utirik.
E
were similar for males and females and for residenis of
For
90
“"Sr on Rongelap a factor of 2 difference betwee Ke
values was observed for males and females.
The female parameter for Rongei-ip
Acall compares with that obtained from the Utirik data.
A paired t-test © { the
Rongelap male and female data indicates thac the male/female difference wis
highly probable and therefore not significant.
15
This difference leads tu °
ee
EU bee etn
1.5x107>
wee
Males
aetna saysEBS,
Rongelap Adults