6

EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION

diation as it emanated from the material itself
made possible an approximate calculation of
the proportion of total dose delivered in each
of several energy regions. Such a calculation,
using spectrometric data on the source material

of mixedfission products and taking into ac-

count this energy degradation by Comptonscattering along the path in air, (1) led to the
dose-energy histogram shown in Figure 1.2.
Roughly there were three regions, with maxima at 100, 700 and 1500 KEV. The total exposure was thus the resultant effect of partial
doses from each energy region, making the exposure energy condition significantly different
from those of radiation therapyor experimental
radiobiology.
The data in Figure 1.2 are based on the spectrumof + day old fission products from a fallout sample. In the absence of other data, this
was taken as representative of the fallout on
all of the islands to which the individuals were
exposed. An energy correction factor for the
radiation measuring instrument was calculated
by weighting the dose from eachenergy interval by an average meter response factor for
that energy (2). A geometry correction factor
wasalso calculated. The total correction resulting from this procedure was found to be about

twenty percent.

Using this correction, the dose rates on the
islands at the time of survey were determined.
Since radioactive decay of the fission products
had occurred betweenthe start of the exposure
and this time, it was necessary to obtain a value
for this decay rate during the exposure period
in order to calculate a total dose in each case.
A large numberof radioisotopes are present in
varying proportions in the fission product mixture, and the total rate of change of radiation
intensity resulting from them may differ somewhat with place and time. The best data available in this case came from fallout samples
taken soon after the detonation at points some
distance from the contaminated atolls. Decay
rates of these samples were measured in the
field and in the laboratory, and a fairly consistent pattern was observed among various lo-

cations and samples. In addition, theoretical
considerations based on the radiochemical composition of the fallout mixture permitted decay
rates to be calculated for different intervals between the timeof initial exposure and later survey readings (3). These agree well with the
experimental data, and were used both in the
dose calculations during the exposure intervals
and in extrapolating the later survey readings
to earlier times.
1.22

Duration of the Exposures

The time of evacuation is knownaccurately
for all the islands; however, the time of arrival
of the radioactive cloud was determined precisely only for Rongerik by means of a continu-

ously recording dose rate monitorlocated at the

weather station on that atoll. As the radiation
intensity rose above the background, a material
with a misty appearance beganto fall. The
times of beginning of fallout for Rongelap and
Ailinginae atolls were estimated from similar
visual observations. These estimates were consistent with the relative distances from thesite
of detonation and the known wind velocities.
Fallout was not observed on Utirik, hence the
estimate of arrival time was madeonthe basis
of wind velocity and distance.
Two extremepossibilities exist relative to the
duration of the fallouts: the first, that the fallout occurred entirely within a short time; the
second, that it was gradual and extended over a

longer period. The monitoring instrument on

Rongerik went off scale at 100 mr/hr, one-half
hour after the dose rate began to rise above
background. If this rate of increase is taken as
constant, and is extrapolated to a point for
which subsequent decay would reduce the dose
rate to the values found at later times, the assumption of a long fallout of about 16 hoursis
found to be necessary. This slow rate of fall
and late maximum time of dose rate was one
limiting case; however this situation was not
considered likely. Existing data are inconclusive, but several indications favor a shorter
“effective fallout time hypothesis” and are summarized below.

Select target paragraph3