PEERS ERED ELALEDS 01 ES&H Assurance & Measurement ‘Uniform Emp loyee Health Status and Occupational Hazards Records System $280,000 This will provide for the development of a "HEALTH TRACK" system. DOE is currently significantly behind the industry-wide state-of-the-art In industry and in Government it is in employee surveillance systems. to concentrate solely no longer sufficient or acceptable on making the workplace safe within the known parameters of the stateof-the-art of ES&H disciplines. Rather what is required is positive assurance that there are no occupationally related adverse health Such assurance can only be provided by effects in the work force. a close, timely, and systematized measurement and surveillance of the integrity of the working environment and of the health status of the workers. NEPA Assurance $140,000 © To the extent possible, the "Executive Summary" will address NEPA assurance. Additionally, a computerized information system would be beneficial in keeping track of the projected environmental impacts versus the actual impact. This would be a "magnanimous" undertaking, but if the work is to be conducted in OES, then we should start budgeting for it. Analysis of Environmental Data at Energy Facilities $250,000 EG&& has been invited to submit a proposed management plan to OES which would provide for complete overall management of effluent onsite discharge and environmental monitoring data systems currently handled by EG& Idaho and the AMS and Graphic Overview Information Systems managed by EG&G Nevada. The requested funds are needed to support development and implementation of such an overall management system for analysis of environmental data and information. 02 ES&H Standards and Criteria Guidelines - ALAP $40,000 This program is in its last year. The BNW requested amount in the schedule 189 is 80K. The OES recommendation was a cut to 40K. The loss of 40K would necessitate cutting the number of drafts to one iteration which would severely lower the quality and acceptability of the final document. The reduction of funds would also impact on the time and number of reviews prior to finalization.