Log: 80-002

PRCEEETERETERTERE

PROPOSAL REVIEW WORKSHEET

(To be used only as a tool in the review process; not to be
construed as a final determination of OFS action)

Originator:

Nevada

Title: AMS - Operations and Technical Support

Type:

Proposal No:

189

Funding Requested.

FY 1977

Operating:

FY 1978

—--~FY.1979__

$1 ,800

Equipment:

$1,457

lead AD: ADEO

$2 5390

$1,200

FY 1980
$3,100

$1,200

Control No: GOOD |

B&R No: GK-ol-ol-08-3

AD Recommendation (Summarize documentation of initial review):

A.

Recommended - Indicate Funding Level, Branch, and OES Project Officer:

B.

Not recommended - reason:

Reviewed by:

Project Officer

Assistant Director

Reviewer Checklist (Not all proposals will require consideration of all

cn & GJ Ky =

of the following, but the reviewer should consider the applicability of
each item below):
.

Responsiveness to the Annual Call.
Applicability to OES programs.

Continuity of OES programs.
Peer review.
Suitability of proposer.

Select target paragraph3