evidence is not particularly helpful in deciding specific causation
in any individual."

Both of these statements are incorrect.

First,

it is well known that epidemiologic studies have documented that
radiation not only causes cancer but also that radiation causes
cancer of specific histologic type.
In fact,

there can be little doubt that, under a wide variety

of circumstances, ionizing radiation is carcinogenic and leukomogenic
in humans.

This conclusion is supported by numerous epidemiologic

studies conducted among human populations
diversity of exposure to radiation.

which have experienced a

Epidemiologic studies of

uranium miners exposed to alpha and gamma radiation have demonstrated
a large excess of bronchogenic cancer.

In addition,

have demonstrated a preponderance of a specific

these studies

histologic type of

cancer, viz small cell undifferentiated carcinoma, when compared to
the general population.

Epidemiologic studies of the survivors of

the atomic bomb explosions at Hiroshima and Nagasaki provide reliable
data on the carcinogenic effects of whole body exposure to camma rays
and neutrons.

Among those individuals,

and breast Cancer,

as well as leukemia,

an excess of lung,

thyroid

has been demonstrated.

This

excess of leukemia was shown to be predominantly of the myelogenous
and granulocytic type.

Conclusive evidence that therapeutic radia-

tion can be carcinogenic and leukomogenic comes from studies of
patients irradiated for ankylosing spondylitis, thymic

enlargement

and gynecological disorders.

In like manner, epidemiologic studies

have shown that radiologists

exposed to radiation have an excess of

leukemia when compared to other physicians not so exposed.

Select target paragraph3