92, For the reasons given above, the defendants have an. affiz- ziva duty to Iully investigate, assess, and report, in a detailed ‘a statement, rogram. <ne total environmental impact of the Bikini resettlement That Iull investigation, assessment, and report muse in- clude (1) an assessment, with the best technological means available, o= the vaciolozgical safety of habitation of the various islands of Sikini isoli; (2) an immediate and independent study of the health risks to those members of our community now residing on Bikini Island in Bikini Atoll; and (3) a comprehensive, detailed, and specific master plan to ensure reasonable economic self-sufficiency for us upon our resettlement of Bikini Atoll, all as alleged with greater particularicy in paragraphs 98-110 infra. The substantive content or that environmental impact statement as well as preliminary or: dvafc environmental impact statementsmust be made known,‘to.usin a language that we can understand. sis Moreover, defendants have a clear Tae a NoamS “Be aac obligation to consider that environmental impact, as expressed ina wage:“eyweaei detailed statement, during the decision-making process with respect ee to the resettlement of Bikini Atoll. 93. a No detailed environmental impact statement on“the 3resettle- ment of Bikini Atoll has been prepared by defendants. 94. Planning, review, and implementation of the resettlement wo, of Bikini Atoll has been carried on, and continues to be:carried on, by defendants without reference to any final environmental inpact statement. September 19, At an interagency meeting in Washington,. Dz Cy on 1975, our counsel were informed by representatives of the Department of the Interior, the Department of Defense, "and. the Energy Research and Development Administration that none of those agencies has any present intention to prepare an environmental impact statement Zor the Bikini resettlement program.