III. MAJOR FIELD INVESTIGATIONS-1965 Preface An extended cross country field trip was undertaken during August and September of 1965. The purpose of this trip was to carry out a number of interrelated studies of environmental radioactivity at a wide variety of geographical locations and with several different types of equipment. In addition, the trip offered an opportunity for a number of groups engaged in the study of environmental radiation problems to discuss their methods, problems, and future plans as well as to intercompare equipment responses at the same locations. During much of this trip we were accompanied by a team from the New York University (NYU) Cosmic Ray Laboratory. Several other research groups joined us for particular segments of the trip. The major experiments completed by us were a resurvey of a number of our 1962 and 1963 field sites to compare present natural and fallout gamma dose rates with our previous Measurements; a determination of cosmic ray ionization as a function of altitude using data obtained at land sites at altitudes up to 12,000 feet and over large lakes at altitudes up to 10,000 feet; a study of NaI(Tl) detector response to cosmic rays as a function of altitude; a series of simultaneous measurements with the NYU team over several lakes; field spectrometric estimates of 137cs soil. activity at or near a number of U. S. Department of Agriculture - HASL Worldwide 90sr soil sampling Sites for comparison with radiochemically determined 13’cs concentrations; an intercalibration with teams from the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory (LRL), Rice University, and NYU over two solid rock outcrops of widely differing y-ray activity; simultaneous measurements with the NYU team at several land sites to estimate B-ray activity; measurements at sites having very low gamma and cosmic ray activity such as deep mines or serpentine outcrops; gamma dose rate measurements with birth defect data, in western Nebraska and for correlatio in New Mexico near Alamagordo, intercomparison with an aerial radiation survey and in Dallas, Texas, experiment. for for comparison with a continuous monitoring

Select target paragraph3