Ls PRIM IE Eatin A Araneae

& Gahwed ,

INZURY!

ITS

PATHOGENESIS AND THERAPY

two

BRADINELON

2

stitution of elements that are no longer bein produced. Tn the second
pategory, one can diatehe the mechanisin as being due to the stinmation
of precursor cells that are injured, but stl capable of responding to physic
logical stimul (erythropoietin, leukocytosis promoting factor, ete. that
are known to exist, although not yet adequately characterized. Titerest
has centered mainly around the mecharisin of the restorative effect in the
first category, aud this will be pursued in some detail here (for reviews of
this subject, see Cronkite and Bond; Bond and Cronkite; Jacobson; Report of U. N. Scientifie Comimittee; Pissuc Homotransplantation Confer
ence).

Studies on measures to induce accelerated restoration of tissues had

their genesis in shielding experiments. Restoration or regeneration of

most tissues occurs in the absenee of special measures if the radiation
dose is low enough to allow spontancous survival (Gt is possible to have
permanent atrophy of some tissues that are not essential to life, e.g.,
reproductive cells, or of portions of tissues that are essential to life).
Of most importance for hnmediate survival at radiation doses in the lethal
range is restoration of the hematopoietic tissues, and the degree to which
shielding or allied procedures accelerates restoration of other tissues, or
influences ultimate longevity, genetic damage or tumor induction, is not
well defined. Shielding or parabiosis apparently does not protect against
most types of radiation-induced neoplasms (Maisin; Brecheret al.; CourtBrown; Finerty), but does against Ivmphoma induction (Kaplan) or
myelocytic leukemia (Uptonef al.) in mice.
Early studies on shielding and restoration of irradiated tissues go back
to Chiari (1912) and Fabricius-Méller (1921) (see Cronkite and Brecher).
The later studies of Jacobson and his associates led to the concept that
“humoral factors’? were present in the shielded spleen of the irradiated

mouse which induced rapid restoration of the irradiated hemopoietic tis-

sues elsewhere in the body. Their work and concepts are summarized in
reviews by Jacobson et al.
Studies on the mechanism of the protection afforded by parabiosis have
been pursued by Finerty ef al., Schneider et a@l., Binhaminer ef al., and
Metz et al., and it was concluded that the effect was not mediated through
spleen, adrenals, or hypophysis (Finertyef al., Schneideret al.). Swift et al.
successively irradiated portions of the body, followed after varying time
intervals with irradiation of the entire remaining portion of the body.
This procedure significantly increased the survival rate. These studies indicated strongly that the protective factor circulates and can be quickly
picked up by tissues that have beenirradiated.

Cole and associates have investigated the possible existence and sub-

20 |

Pm

cellular location of the protective “spleen factor.” Early in their work,

ub 3
ch

Select target paragraph3