a) Procedures should be established to have all thyroid abnormalities reported to a central file where periodically the effects would be correlated with dose~level. Detailed dosimetric reconstructions should be made for those individuals developing thyroid abnormalities, with particular emphasis given to evaluation of prior X-ray therapy. In fact, a retrospective - survey should be made to document the prevalence ; a of medical irradiation of Utah infants to determine what effect this might have on the iodine 131 studies. Also, new techniques should be explored for improved estimates of iodine 131 dose (see Appendix). e) If the Utah study is to yield maximum information, it must receive long-term support. Many years may elapse before the appearance of delayed effects of irradiation. If no effects appear, it will be even more imperative to document the study extremely thoroughly, because it is much more difficult to prove that a given dose is safe than to verify that a higher dose is dangerous. However, the establishment of a safe dose is of much greater importance. 3) While thyroid cancer has been of major concern in this paper, other conditions should be considered, a study (Starr et. al.) of such as the more frequent benign thyroid tumors. In / 74 children and adolescents treated with iodine 131 for hyperthyroidism (an overactive thyroid) and followed for two ~ fourteen years, there were five thyroid tumors of which only one (a papillary adenocarcinoma) was malignant.?? in a different study, out of eighteen children treated with iodine 131 for hyperthyroidisz, six thyroid tumors were observed five - fourteen years later.1© times. More cases may yet appear after longer follow-up DOE ARCHIVES Se

Select target paragraph3