mkNed
ui

4

ISL

vsNeitems

Continued from 7th Page
interior subcommittee on appropriations. opened the first of a series of
hearings on the money bill and the
plight of the Bikimians.
At the Apri 12 session of the Yates
subcommittee, Trust Terrmtory officials testified that it was their belief
Bikint Island would be off limits for 30
to 50 years but that Eneu. 10 miles

away, was likely to be a safe site for
permanent resettlement.
Adrian Wynkel, current high commissioner of the

=AS FACE REMOVAL

NES

Trust Territory, tes-

tified that “even knowing of the danger.” those already living on Bikini
Island wanted to stav there and that
there was some indication others
from Kili wanted to Jom them on the
condemned home island.
The suncommittee was told that final determination of whether Eneu
was safe for permanent relocation
could not be made until aout Jan. 1,
1979, when radioactivity levels of
fruit and vegetables grown in an experimental garden plot on the island
would be made known by the Departmentof Energy.
But the witnesses agreed that the
Bikinians could remain where they
were without harm until Jan. 1 if they
just stuck to the rules and refrained
from eating the coconuts—unless,
they added in qualification, the medica] tests (whole body counts) to be
made on the Bikinians later in April
showed sharp jumps in internal radiawen dosage. And that was not expected.
McCraw, now chief of special
projects branch of the Energy DePartment’s division of environmental

safety, said in an interview in early
May, “We can show that Eneuis lower (in radioactivity) by a factor of 10
than BikimIsland. . . Eneu could be
a residence island without restrictions, which means you can eat the
fish you catch in the lagoon, you can
grow anv crop. I'm convinced that

these Eneu (test) crops are going to
show very much lower levels than
the Bikini numbers.”

At the Department of the Interior,
Ruth Van Cleve. chef of territorial
afiairs: John DeYoung. her top assistant and Hign Commissioner Winkel
all thought Eneu was the most acceptabl> second choice of the Bikinians.
But now ail three were cautious
about the data they were getting
from the Energy Department. “All we
can do at any stage 1s listen to what
the experts say—and hope they’re
night,” Mrs. Cleve said.
“The decisions of 1967-68 (that Bikini was safe for resettiement) were
based on available knowledge,”
Winkel said. “And now we arein virtuaily the same position. The decisions we make now will be cased on
avaiable knowledge.”
But less than two weeks later,
there was bad newsfor the Bikinians.
The report on the April whole body
counts on the Bikimans showed a
startling increase in internal radiation
doses.
The readings ranged up to .98,
neariy double the federal safety standard of .5 rems.
Including the external radiation dosage of .2, the same as in the past, the
top reading was 1.18.
At the same time, and Just as startlingly, preliminary results of testing
on coconuts grown on Eneu showed
radioacuvity levels five to six times
higher than had been expected.
Tesiufving at the May 22 session of
the Yates subcommittee, Mrs. Van

Cleve said the latest results required
a fast overhaul ofplans.

First, she said, although there was

no immediate hazard to their health.
the peonle must be removed from Bikini island within 90 days. Second,it
appeared that Eneu must be ruled out
as the alternative site of the permanent resettlement.
At the samesession, at the head of
a smal] delegauion of Bikini leaders.
was Magistrate Tomaki Juda, son of
the man who was chief in 1946. Although born on Bikim. the 36-year-

old Tomaki was too young to remem-

ber details of the first removal. But

he had heard stories of that time <
his life.
He repeated one now to the sut
committee: When the naval office
had told the people they must leas
the island a generation ago, he ha
compared them “to the children ofIs
racl whom the Lord saved from the
enemy and led into the promise

land.” .

It had not worked out that way.
“We are more akin to the childre
of Israel wnen thev left Egypt an
wandered through the desert for 4

years,” the dark-skinned. dignifie

Bikinian said. “We left Bikini an
have wandered through the ocean fc

32 years, and we will never return t

our promised land.”
In fact Tomaki was back on Bikir
on June 1]aforg with High Commis
sioner Winkel, but only to break th:
news to the people and to discus
with them where they wanted to go.
Winkel’s

recommendations

wer:

read into the record at the June 1
meeting of the Yates subcommittee
He noted that those living on Brkin
Island told him that if they could no
remain there, or at least on Eneu
they preferred to move to “public do.
main" land in Hawaii or to the mainland of the United States.
Hesaid the majority of those living
on Kili apparently preferred to remain there. But, he added. some
wanted to join the Bikini residents
wherever they mightbe relocated.
Further tests on Eneu foodstuffs
would be required before the island
could be finally ruled out, Winkel
said. But he was not optimistic. And,
without quite spelling it out, he
seemed to dismiss the thought of relocating the Bikinians in Hawaii or on
the mainland.
“On the basis of all the factors,”
Winkel summedup, “It is my decision
that the people of Bikini Island should
be relocated to Kili Island at this
ume.”

Winkel’s statement to the subcomPlease Turn to Page 10, Col. 2

Select target paragraph3