RAetnaAyAM eat ny pe be ae A a
aRRE Re AEpa tc
i
i
Fig
35
SCIATAMETER
Tha following cal tbration stud
ies vere comteted in connect
ton
with CASTS,
locat
and Date
Eniwetok,
Feb.,
Jaxat’'?
19S
wad
ONE
GENE
7 &
Bikini, Merch, 195)
NYO weusa
WILLIAM
TOKE
Tagtrument
SC DITAKSTER
SX INTAMETER
Nuclear Inst. Corpec61™y
SCINTAMETIR:
SC INTAMETER:
In addition, neagurenents take
Rongwiap, Rongerilk, and Ut irik n by independent survey parties at
using several different type
warvey instruments have beeq
s of
related
to corresponding aerial meas
urwmente with the SCINTAMS
TER during the routine exec
ABLE survey pattern. | One
ution of tia
other set of factors wag
obta
Persof rel of the Weather Repo
ined by
rting Element with both 2
SCINTAMETER
and TTB, The record of
the identity of the atol
l where this wes
obtained has been
lost,
,
aources.- Another. sato
using TUMBLER=SNAPPYR tage,
sites ag
lata, obtained hy an
pendent group
using « TIE during the f
UPSHOT-RNOTHOLE series, inde
is avatlable for
comparison,
(TS An nnlanetapereaipennabereenimtant
7
,
NMG TO Henmegem, Aora
ltepretenseniteneti
RALRITPT oyoy Ninteaet cg f
part greet,SC BRE
ey
Air to ground. calibration, for
the SCINTILOG wag performed. by
Personnel. in Nevada. in 1932
HASL,
:
The attemation curve applied:
duri
ngCA
STLE
is shown in Figure 36,
Tile: curve: fe based: upon dats
: obtained at JANET then late
tiated. by :tudtee. performe
r substand at. WILL
IAM and YORE and by alac
ellanecug
coineidentel date obtained
& variety of scurce areass during CASTLE. these aites represent
snr ‘sistance, YOKE and JANE
_ Bile and 5/8 atle across resp
T ace 1/a
ect ively,
There ts good aereement:
among
islands and between. the. resu the studies at the threeselected
ltant curve developed fro
and the miscellaneous data
m t2< sestudies:
., The extrapolation of
the. attenmation
carve to sero altitude
yields « factor of ? whic
h is approx imately
equivalent to the atreraft
hall absorption,
Individual seta of the
GENS attenuation data
d iffer markedly frez
@acn other and their aver
age at®smation curve diff
ers markedly
from the bulle of the CAST
LE data. The twee sete or
data taken tn
41-