A Aen ees mee cee
TO:
Darol Froman
—2—
DATE:
May 20, 1954
purpose in doing this was to obtain a series of 24-hour urine specimens.
We felt that this should give us confirmation of our feeling that in such
situations the external exposure rather than the internal exposure is the
limiting factor.
A second series of such specimens is being studied at
the present time. We believe that we proved our point. We also established the fact that the Rongelap natives had taken into their systems
greater amounts of mixed fission products than is customarily regarded
as permissible. We feel that Eisenbud was overly optimistic and probably
mistaken in his letter of 6 April to Dr. Kobayashi, It is our belief that
the assay carried out at NYO failed to measure total activity (they did
not have adequate instruments to do this), and also failed to detect the
presence of volatile fission products, principally q131,
Assuming an individual has already received a fairly large dose of external
exposure, it is difficult to estimate to what extent this affects a concurrent internal exposure.
We frankly don't know whether the two things
operate independently or whether they aid and abet each other. Dr. George
LeRoy of Argonne, who studied the Hiroshima and Nagasaki cases, told me
this week that it was his opinion that a couple of these Japanese fishermen might die and that, in his opinion, their deaths would result from
their internal exposure to mixed fission products. We in H-Division do
not agree with him but I mention it to point out the fact that differences
of opinion on this general subject still exist even among the well-informed.
A well done urine analysis of the Japanese fishermen such as we could have
done here might have indicated the presence of large amounts of certain
fission products whose excretion could have been speeded up immensely by
adequate treatment.
Determining whether such treatment should have been
started and knowing how long and how vigorously it should be pursued would
have depended on repeated urine assays, something which the Japanese were
incapable of doing. This, again, would have been a specific benefit to
patient and physician alike.
Much of our indecision about what constitutes adequate treatment in such
cases results from the lack of adequate factual data on humans. I believe
that the Rongelap natives have provided about as much scientific information as we can squeeze out of them; I am happy to report from firsthand
observation that all except the babies were unbelievably cheerful and co—
operative. The Japanese presumably received significantly larger doses,
both external and internal. They almost certainly represent the precise
dose range in which we are most keenly interested. We know that with
smaller doses the people will get well anyway, and with larger doses they
will die before we can do anything about it and in spite of what we can do.
The Japanese received about ‘the doses where they might die without treatment
but might be saved under proper management. I only wish that we had had a
number of these urine specimens to study here.
I apologize for the length-of this epistle; I intended it to be terse and
succingte See what happened!
COPIED
~ LANL RG
ATA
Ranmon
;
ot
_,
TS
oo
“ge i ehTREES “
yoA.
of “fA
Te, SHIPMAN, M. »: a
’
).