C, C, tt Multiple Address d, -2- Discussion of results of available corrective sction on doses shown inl, c. Radiological Implications of Duta Obtained from the Survey a. Presentation und discussion of the radiation exposure criteria against which survey findings will be compared, b. Comparison of survey findings with radiation exposurecriteria, ec. Identification of specific areas where the comparisonof survey findings with radiation exposure criteria suggest a need for corrective action, and assessment of the effeetiveness of proposed corrective action in reducing exposures, Judgments and Kecommended Actions It is planned that the final chapter of the Radioicgical Survey Report be written in such a say that it can be used, with only miner moditication, as Section | of the Task Group document, Similarly, Section 3 of the Task Group documentis to be written in such a form that it can be used directly as part of a Commission document reeommending action to be taken by DNA, 7, ‘> Since it is expected that the surveyfindings will be available to the Drafting Group on Octoher |, we propose to have a draft copy of the Task Group document readyfor distribution on October 15, Allowing two weeks for distribution and for receipt of comments, the Drafting Group will meet in Germantown on October 29 to prepare the final document for distribution on Novemberlt. One of the key actions that must be taken if the above schedule is to be met is to obtain an early agreement on the approach to be used in development of recommenditions and specifically on the use to be made of currciut guidance on radiation protection, The Drafting Group discussed this, and 2greed that Section 2.4 of the report, dealing with criteria for cleanup, should be drafted and circulated immediately for review and comment, This has been done, and 4 draft of that section is enclosed for your consideration, COR nee pers em a merge cree nenaROEOE OO TORETRERTTOO T EMYT pagemaen Pope. . uf ¥ “he y . af ae meg ee at oS ttt, ote’ a arc