A State rent py svoverner cs
or the
ecd ter Oo ake ate |
gree de
4
'
4 ‘
Under the 1958 amencment: te rhe*matieénil 7
vefenmse lepislation, the Congress cxpressixs ‘eclared, ag its oo'.:
ane ontent, that
“a system of civil defense fox
te protection of 1.
uit moperte in
reanpansibtiicy
+s
“oor vides ane ¢)
the United States fru attest
for civil defense sha’] be vor:
Soonb)y ir ta
cies
orang t
and the several state: ane eb
tre eho
~apnitude of
The Congress p.ainis bei ever thar the toc.
the problems of protecting our aisiiian populacio: Te: "he conse
quences of thermonuclear attach weule
call mer
<
for the fullest, cooperative
frert cv ait levsre
federal, state and ioral
THOS appre ae peer os
PoP
%
2
ome beat
ATaqnent
8
8
ae
Sut
One of the endurinp meri ¢« ct! cur federal «vse:
& ts flextbility.
It does not require thet atriet Jurisdictions”
w1es be drawn
between the state, local o: fed rel tesponsibili' es
iner chan those
which the Constitution has expr: s:ly assigned
miszitade of oc
operative arrangement:
is icee tote
action may come either from
loec.i
the
the
time,
the occasion,
which federal,
am
state and
lc
commonly shared and well-d' fine
might well be beyond the c. paca
acting independently
:of th
arder whdeh
oF
need
stete
ma,
avercrent
1
toe
cote.
oieder
wervant
.
vn
ply
For
‘.tonvenents under
¢fficig a
ve
yursese cen schee
te
chvust
ipencles as
le
poate with a
ricne that
ce onrer
So, in the case of al.cit protection, 4.
involving all levels vf government
shew id permit
delicate and complex balance betueen the deatrabt)
strength and federal ieade:sh.f
roche one Hane
of action and initfative, roche othe:
Teehr tea
legalistic arguments as te reer
te | peramount
lie do not contribute tt ' +
soppy bars cv atoe
problem for al] of sis
orerative approach,
as °
ahieve tat
go
o*
% centri’
are
1) freedom
eortedicticra. or
wepotarpd ity ray
"6 an orpent
This afternoon the
extent of the effort that
wha
the
ecersl of tetals 2 0)
ar wo ci
bee anade to
“cog fhe
teral powern-
ment in the foresceabie fu ur
« aehieve fal oun vreree tion and ts
support the states in the:
«for
4
praw id
wey
we tion for thet
people.
Regardless, however.
government, regardless of
ke
«
be
yo
Jewe) of
* tunds
off
hi
re
0 oe federal
"ef pnera gt vern-
ment may make available, roeparc.e-s ot tne dneuoerm dr:
which the federal povernment va
*£oy focedms sort
fallout protection, tnere
|i
hoe be ve a Rae R
ful program for providing «:
voy tote da
need for state initiative
Fallout threatens tie
ead fo
and
the sefet
ate incentives
con opment ot
ooAnW fur cessrr
:
try
indio.dual
and in a highly personal wiy, «ve
within the secur?
FoPis ow
home. The health and safeny 9) aur
iftizene an’
os)
om arity of their
homes is a classic area of stat ine loral ceneer
in
‘ce resroneibility.
This concerr ig n> ter~ shea th threat oor.
than it is when the threat .!e: 4: 1 rea.
pootat |
pollution, unsafe or fisvar teu!
cf
8 at
owe
disorder
.
from *alsout
.aber
oaty
rimqee oF