27

in Section IV. The other physical findings, which

Table 15

have been carefully tabulated in the individualre-

Composition of Pediatric Groups, 1972
Age at exposure, yr

No. males

Rongelap group

~

<10

10-19
In utero
Ailingnae group
<10
Unexposed group
Born 1945-1954
Born 1935-1944

No.females

children. The usual spectrum of infectious and

10

9

5
3

9
I

2

+

22
11

19
7

skeletal development (left hand and wrist) was
initiated,*#! and systematic documentation of an-

thropometric data was started. The documentation was continued during the succeeding examinations on subjects considered to be in the growth
phase (generally through age 20). The datarecorded reguiarly included standing height (stature), body weight, head circumference, head
width, head length, chest circumference, bi-

acromial width, and calf circumference, and sporadically includedsitting height, chest width, chest
depth, and buttocks circumference. (See Appendix 7.)

ports for each survey, indicate no definite pattern
of abnormalities that would differentiate the exposed children from the unexposed comparison

.

The developmentof secondary sex characteristics was qualitatively assessed according to the
standard criteria generally accepted in growth
studies (Greulich et al.,4? Shuttleworth#?). Such

procedures included the staging of breast development in girls; estimation of the type, pattern,
and amount of bodyhair(facial, pubic, axillary,
etc.). and staging of the growth of penis and testes
in boys. During several examinations, photo-

graphic documentation was doneas partof the
assessment of growth status and physique.
The roentgenographic evaluation of skeletal
development was donebythe inspectional technique of Greulich and Pyle,4! and the American
standards were used for comparison.
2. Physical Findings

The early post-exposure examinations indicated
that the youngerchildren, in general, manifested
more extensive and moresevere radiation injury
than the older children and adults. Followingrecovery from the acuteeffects of radiation, the overall physical status of the children appeared to be
normalexcept for the subsequent developmentof
thyroid abnormalities, which are discussed below

noninfectious diseases, congenital anomalies, and
physiological variations has been noted in both ex-

posed and unexposed children.
3. Growth Status

Interpretation of the anthropometric data and
assessment of the growth status of the exposed
Rongelap children have been complicated by (a)
radiation injury to the thyroid gland, (b) partial
or total thyroidectomies in the children who developed thyroid neoplasia, and (c) the administration of thyroid hormoneto the entire exposed Rongelap population since September 1965. If the

data on the three children (Nos. 3, 5, and 65) who
were obviously hypothyroid and had markedly
small body measurements are excluded, compari-

sons of mean stature and skeletal age indicated no
statistically significant difference between the exposed and unexposed children for either boys or
girls.
Compared with American norms, the mean

skeletal ages at given chronological ages for each
group were, for unexposed girls, quite similar, but
for unexposed boys, they appeared to be delayed
by 6 to 7 months at each chronological age.
Earlier preliminary comparisons had suggested
that boys exposed at age <(3 years were retarded
in statural growth compared with unexposed boys.
The current analysis excludes those with a specific
diagnosis of hypothyroidism. The individual growth
and development curves for 13 children exposed
at age <5 and their controls are shownin Figures

21 and 22. The effect of thyroid treatmenton the
two boys (Nos. 3 and 5) is evident. Several other
children (Nos. 2, 19, 65, 42) had a tendencyto-

wardretarded development, which may have been
improved by thyroid medication.
Onthe 4 children exposed in uéero, careful exam-

inations have resulted in no unusual physicalfindings. The growth progress of 3 of them has been
similar to that of age peers (see Table 16). One
boy (No. 85) has had a head circumference
smaller than the average for unexposed males and
a slightly retarded pattern of skeletal maturation,
but his statural growth curve was comparable with
that of unexposed males.

Select target paragraph3