17

cous membranes from improperly prepared arrow-

Table 1!

root flour is not uncommon. Both have erroneously

been associated with radiation effects in the minds
of the Rongelap people.
Diabetes mellitus is a major problem andis discussed separately in Section III. G.

A program is under wayto build new dispen-

saries on the outer islands. On Ebeye a new hospital building has provided improved conditionsfor
health care.
It is against this general background that our
examinations take place. Weare privileged to get
generous help from the local health authorities in
our task, and conversely when weare on the scene

we cannotavoid getting involved in problemsoutside the scope of fallout complications.
Majorphysical findings during the past 5 years
are listed in Table 8.

B. VITAL STATISTICS: FERTILITY AND MORTALITY

The numberoflive births during the last 5-year
period was 37 amongthe exposed and 69 amongthe
unexposed. Calculated as live births per year per
1000 population these numbersgive a birthrate of
112 for the exposed and 106 for the unexposed. In
addition, there -were 10 miscarriages amongthe
exposed and 18 among the unexposed, so that, in
both groups, one pregnancyout of five ended in
miscarriage. This is approximately the samefrequency as observedin the past (see Table 9).
Legal abortions are not performed in the Marshall Islands, and there is no reason to believe that

any of the pregnancy terminations on record were
provoked. Family planning has not been practiced
in the past althoughit ts slowly gaining ground.
We therefore believe that the fertility and fetus
viability indicated by these statistics are the natural ones, and, although the exposed females showed

an apparentincrease in miscarriages during the
first 5 years, there is no evidence suggesting that
the history of exposure to radiation has had any
permanenteffect on either.
The people who havedied arelisted by year in
Table 10, with their age and probable cause of
death (such deathcertificates as are available are

not alwaysspecific). The overall! mortality rate for
the 20-year period is ~12 per 1000 per yearfor
the exposed Rongelap group and ~ 13 for the unexposed; for the last 5-year period the rates are
~9 and ~21 respectively. These differences are
not statistically significant; in such small groups

Mortality, Utirik

(Av, age at death: 6123)
Year

1956
1957
1957
1957
1958
1959
1959
1959
1959
1960
1960
1960
1961
1961
1963
1964
1964
1964
1965
1965

Subject

Age

No.

& sex

Year

2118
2184
2219
2222
2243
2122
2427
2170
2187
2116
2131
2180
2177
2199
2203
2163
2190
2192
2121
2154

24M
63 M
57F
63 F
50 M
87M
73M
46 M
61F
27F
35 F
76 M
11M
49 F
71F
75 M
85 F
84 F
68 M
51 F

1965
1965
1965
1965
1967
1967
1967
1968
1968
1968
1968
1969
1969
1970
1970
1971
1971
1972
1972
1973
1974

Subject
No.

2183
2204
2238
2253
2181
2202
2223
2101
2112
2141
2259
2191
2214
2175
2211
2258
2246
2178
2252
2186
2201

Age

& sex

67M
71F
63 F
56M
78 M
72F
79 F
62 M
70M
67 F
36 F
90 F
80 M
73M
65 M
64 M
25 F
37M .
57M
67 F
68 F

observed over such short periods, differences this
large or larger could occur by chance ( ¢<0.05).
Even so, had the trend been in the opposite direction, we would have had reason to be concerned;

as an example, we are keeping a careful watch on the
apparent increase in malignancies (see Section V).
The mortality rate among the exposed Utirik
people was ~13 for the 20-year period and ~14
for the last 5 years. The deathsarelisted in Table
11, but causes are not given becauseofinsufficient
data.

Recent misconceptions make it necessary to
clarify comparisons with district- wide statistics.
Thevital statistics of the Trust Territory have improved greatly over the 20 years covered by these
reports, but they are still not published in sufhcient detail to permit valid comparisons with ours.

The age distributions are too different: district-

wide the median age is 16 years, whereas in our
groupit is between 30 and 40. Thedifference between the mortality in the general population (~7
per 1000 per year) and thatin our groups (~ 13)
reflects this difference in age distribution andis
not related to the history of exposure. A similareffect can be seen on the birthrate (~40 per 1000
per year district-wide and ~110 in our groups).

Select target paragraph3