. ... .. ..- . . . -4. . General Discussion: Identifying topics for discussion with LLL during rest of the day. Thompson: The document should stop at dose assessment, i.e., it should not make comparisons with guidelines. Francis: Will there be a document that indicates what the cleanup actually accomplished Gilbert: in terms of reducing radionuclide Expressed his general concern about inadequate statistical LLL Scientists Arrive: levels? discussion of aspects in the draft report. Robison, Mount, Phillips, and Clegg Robison handed out the following: (a) Historical and Cultural Background of the People of Enewetak written by Bob Kiest (U. of Hawaii). (b) Revised pages 8 and 9 of the LLL post cleanup dose assessment. (c) Memos dated May 15 and 23, 1979 from Michael Robison and Mitchell Pritchard to regarding the Ujelang diet survey. (d) Two summary tables of diet survey information. (e) Revised Appendix A to dose assessmnt report (external doses). Robison gives a review and update Diet: A 12 oz. coke can was used to indicate of a given food do you eat?” week? foc~ intake - “how many cans worth How frequently would you eat that much in This information was extrapolated Approximately to a month and year basis. 150 people (=25% were interviewed. adult males were summarized Next they summarized The diet results for first (this went into the first draft). the kid diets, then the females. It turns out that adult females eat more than adult males (according to the diet survey). Hence, the female diet rather than the male diet is limiting. Based on casual observation by LLL scientists, it is reasonable to believe that Enewetak females eat more than males (they are fatter and get less exercise). The gram intakes estimated from the diet survey seem reasonable. ● -