dien.
aq
.
“
PRIVACY ACT MATERIAL REMOVen4
ok
va y
a
ome
“A.
mo
)
eM
: ‘x
*
1
;
30f
‘3
:
1(M)
:
;
-
ok
}
.(M)
al
= TO
2
7
a
x 20r
= 40
i3
Jea
30
3
{F)
(M)
—
|
Sor
sot
4
ii
(M)
(M)
~_
gn
(F)
‘
3
'F)
20r
lob
.
bipspaurrrrpr torr ptr per ri tire rer td
1955
|
Fig. 18.
1956
|
1957
oe
Latet
.
SS
Cs!*? trends in humans
(2)
The February, 1956, point on the CEM curve has been dropped
(3)
an arith- on
The June 28,1955, point on . _. has been corrected for
.
(4)
Data taken from April 1, 1955, until July 1, 1955, were not in-
since an exhaustive examination of the operating log book disclosed that the
pulse height analyzer had malfunctioned on other runs during that day.
metical error.
cluded in the original graph since the subjects had been measured while
wearing their own street clothes which may have carried contamination.
Since these values are the only existing measurements of Cs/3? body burdens during this time, the data have been re-examined. In cases where
the K body burden-has agreed with subsequent values taken understandard
conditions, the early data have been assumed to be correct and have been
added to the curve.
(5)
Curves for five additional subjects have been waded. Several
runs which gave higher than normal potassium values for female subject
were dropped. These high values were discovered to be due to the.
subject's wearing a foundation garment which had a measurable amount
ofpotassium.
(6)
5012128
oF
OF
f
The curves have been extended to June 1957.
PRIVACY AGT’MATERIAL’REMOVED
iz