Dr. Don Hendricks
operation.

-7-

August 28, 1972

I rather suspect that this is true only if the source

of contamination is such that the concentrations can be regarded as having a

smooth gradient in both directions from some maximum -- one might thus
visualizethree dimensional plot of concentrations as a hill of some
regular shape, so that evenly spaced sampling locations make plotting contours
somewhat easier and efficient.

However, in view of thehistory of contamination*

at Eniwetok I should doubt that there are many spots where this kind of
pattern can be expected.

Instead one might expect that the pattern would

be sufficiently heterogenous that a "grid" pattern would give results that
Took much like a random pattern.

Thus the main advantage to a systematic

pattern would be ease of locating plots.

This can be a distinct advantage,

but there are also some further disadvantages.

One that concerns me is the

aforementioned evidence that the frequency distribution will be skewed.

I

suspect that it will be important to have the best data we can get as to the

shape of that distribution and such information ought to come from a random
set of sample points.

The shape of the distribution becomes important, it

seems to me, if it becomes necessary to make exact statements about the fraction of the area (or volume) that will exceed a specified concentration.

That

is, suppose it is decided that concentrations of more than x picocuries per

gram must be ‘tleaned up".

One then would like to be able to fit a theo-

retical curve and ‘use it to make probability statements about the fraction
of the area (volume) that exceeds x picocuries per gram.

How one actually

goes about that calls for some more discussion, a topic we'll return to
below.

For the present, I only want to make the point that random sampling is

indicated.
The actual process of drawing a random sample has been discussed with

Ollie Lynch.

We recommend that a rather fine grid ?*say, 50 foot intervals

be laid down on a map and numbered.

The actual locations should then be

selected from a table of random numbers and plotted on the map.

The order

in which the sample points are located should be recorded, so that any Tast

minute decisions to change sample size can be easily handled (i.e., by dropping
the last samples selected; or by adding more if needed).

The arid interval

can be ected on practical grounds--i.e., how accurately it is assumed that
a particular location can be found by pacing.

However, it js wise to use

a finer grid than such considerations may indicate, and it is essential to leave
no ambiguity in instructions for field work--that is field crews should have
exact instructions as to distances and directions and be told to sample at the

Select target paragraph3