1s
—————
oo
INTENSITY
3 asf
=
= s
coer
,
-
ito
AELATIVE
4i
t
.
\
:
|
1
fA
gal
‘
|
.
\
l be
f
@ ef
0
"_!
©
aps veEniag
|
=
f
_
|
fot
i
|
.
|
_|
:
:
oy
Naa0e
fy top it
t
(tee!
I;
©
4
|
8
9
|
2
4
6
wR
F
;
|
°
TF
j
|
a:
;
i
Mesaging
7
EEE Z|
7
’
ps
.
?
ff.
{
‘
+
L
:
;
eA
ee
{gta
a
Oe
88
ave-eeeniag
EO
I
iit
ee
|
ee
ee ae
Necnting oo
DISTANCE OF LEADING EDGE FROM DETECTOR (MUMCREDS OF FEET
Figure 1.9 Relative intensity from
an enveloping base surge (90° cloud
model, 1.25 Mev gamma).
INTENSITY
i
ty
|
DISTANCE OF LEADING EDGE FROM DETECTOR (mUMOREDS OF FELT!
RELATIVE
|
Z wo
A
“e
_
itty
:
:
i
4
:
‘
°
|
“Popp oy
3?
0b:
|
SEER
ELL
pen
NO
_\ ee
,
:
!
:
bot
oa
ii
_
—
Figure 1.10 Relative intensity from
an enveloping base surge (60° cloud
model, 1.25 Mev gamma).
PaTCcn
RADIUS2 149 FT
0.6
|
a2
\
7
o
Parcn
Ness *74 ¥F
a
9
KOE
100
DISTANCE FROM
aerrr
DETECTOR
400
300
200
TO
CEWTER
OF
AREA
$00
(FTI
Figure 1.11 Relative intensity for moving circular patches of radioactive
water (circular disk model, 1 1, feet thick, 1.25 Mev gamma).
40