Table 8. Results of retrospective analyses suggesting the presence of thyroid dysfunction prior to surgery in certain exposed Marshallese (1980). Date of Sub ject No & sex at 19M serum sample 22 1963 470 33F 74F 1972 83M" C/m1) 1963 1963 1965 1966 69F Serum TSH 1974 Normal control range: Serum T Est imated thyroid dose (units) 6.5 0.84 2 1100 1.4 0.64 4 1 1150 5.7 9.5 8.3 16.3 _ 0-6.0 Age 2t exposure Ceg/add 6.9 8.2 22 6.7 TBGL 3.3 5-10.22 1.01 0.80 0.82 -— 0.98 (years) (rads) 5 1000 1000 15 425 in utero >175 0.85-1.10 *This infant's mother (No. 74) had an estimated thyroid dose of 425 rads. Ie was of interest to measure TSH in frozen plasma samples obtained years earlier to determine whether individuals might have had evidence of thy— roid dysfunction prior to surgery. In many cases only one sample obtained prior to surgery was available. The criterion used in these instances was that serum TSH be >6 1J/ml on at least one occasion. It was assumed, but not proved, that TSH is relatively stable in plasma samples stored at -20°F for prolonged periods. This conclusion was supported by resuits on subject No. 5, who had a serum TSH of 500 U/ml in a samp! obtained in 1963, but obviously it is uncertain what that value would have been had this specimen heen measured fresh. Since all subjects were on T, therapy after 1963, it should be assumed that these results might underestimate the prevalence of presurgical hypothyroidism. In any case, six individuals exhibited biochemical evidence of mild to severe degree of hypothyroidism prior to surgery (Table 8). The most marked abnormality was observed in subject No. 69, in whom a serum TSH of 470 wWU/ml was found in a sample obtained in 1963. This subject had surgery performed in 1964. Three individuals had modest elevations in serum TSH, between 16 and 22 U/ml, and the remaining two had mild abnormal- ~ ities. Most but not all of these elevated serum TSH values were associated with decreased serum tree-thyroxine indices, and all were in subjects exposed at a young age, four receiving an estimated thyroid dose >1000 rads. Receiving lower thyroid doses were No. 74, who was 15 at the time of expo ure, and No. 83, who was in utero (gestational age v6 mc). These results appear to be consistent with observation; in subjects No. 3 and 5. In addition to the-results on the above 13 subjects in Tables 7 and 8, which indicated primary thyroid dysfunction as a consequence of radiation -73- .