DNA 1240H-2

each disc for each particle-size class until the diec hite the ground.

The effect of this process is to determine the distribution of fallout

by tracking 8 maximm of 9000 different discs (depending on yield), each

representing
a given particle-size range originating at a given altitude
in the cloud. The fraction of activity associated with each particlesize clase must also be known, to permit deposit dose-rate estimates.

Dose-rate and dose values calculated from this model are in agreement

with measurements made following the surface and underground shots of

Operation Jangle.

Use of the D-Model to predict reasonably accurate fallout contours
for water-surface bursts will be possible only with several fundamental

changes of parameters used in the computer program.

Weapons-test data

rates are different from those of earth particles.

It follows, there-

have indicated that slurry-type fallout droplets from water-surface
bursts differ from land-surface-burst fallout particles in size range,
composition, density, and mass-activity relationships.
In addition,
the time-history of the formation of slurry droplets and their falling

fore, that fallout patterns for water-surface bursts would differ from
those for land-surface bursts. Furthermore, it must be understood that
there is no such thing as a dose-rate contour at sea because fallout
mixes fairly rapidly with the water, although on a large ship located
at a fixed point, deposit dose could build up as on a land target. Work
is in progress at NRDL to determine the required changes in parameter

values that would permit application of the D-Model to water-surface-

burst fallout prediction.

When the appropriate program changes are

effected, the output of the D-Model will indicate deposit that would
take piace on @ large, flat, unwashed surface, and must be interpreted,

together with ship size and countermeasure system, to provide dose or
dose rate information.
Predictions that are given in Ref. & for deposit dose from a
water-surface shot have been based on a compromise of predictions of

effects of a land-surface shot as given in Refs. 2 and 69, and as com-

puted from the lami-surface D-Model. 67

It has been impossible to

determine the degree of accuracy of the predictions of Ref. &, since
no water-surface shot of this type has been fired. It was assumed that
the base surge is a minor mechanism of transport of radioactivity, that
fallout from the cloud is the main source of deposited activity, and

that the cloud dimensions are comparable to or exceed those of the base

surge.

It was further assumed that the deposited activity builds up

in @ linear manner with time during the period of deposition.
The times
of initial arrival and final arrival of activity were estimated on the

pasis of fallout from the cloud as determined by the falling rates of
icles and by the assumed

prevailing winds.

Then the deposit dose,

» accumilated at a point during the time interval from ty, time of
jnitial arrival of activity, to any time after burst, t, may be expressed
y:
t

De

dat

&

BEST AVAILABLE COPY
17-78

(17-24)

Select target paragraph3