for the implementation of those two Points through an amendment to the Compact (infra, proposals, Section III). The implementation es well as the Four Points in general, be submitted for the must still consideration of the Marshall Islands Government. TI. The Validity and Legal Effects of Points One and Two Under International Law 1. There is nothing in international law which would prevent the Governments of the Marshall Islands and the United States from undertaking the obligaticns set forth in Points One and Two. In other words, if Points One and Two are embodied in certain provisions of the Compact, norm of international law which would there is no render such provisions invalid solely by reason of their centent. Indeed, treaties containing obligations similar to those envisioned in Points One and Two example, are common in international the Agreement Between the U.S.S.R. Concerning the Aaland Islands, l/ 1/ relations.= For and Finland signed at Moscow on October 11, Treaty previsions analogous to Point One are those which provide for the demilitarization of a certain territory, or prohibit the building of fortifications. See, e.g., Article 42 of the Treaty of Versailles, done on June 28, 1919, U.S. Treaty, vol. III, p. 3351; Agreement Between the U.S.S.R. and Finland Concerning the Aaland Islands, signed at Moscow on October 11, 1940, Article 1, 67 U.N.T.S., No. 872, pp. 140-151. Treaty provisions similar to Point Two can be found in treaties of alliance. See, e.g., Convention Between the United States and Panama, done on November 18, 1903. 33 Stat. 2234 (1903-1905), T.S. No. 431.