N irrigation and in some cases, even movable sprinklers, but in many of the cases they were just natural meadows. The next slide (JK-22). Now here is the data base. Here are some of _the characteristics of the data base as it resides in the Livermore computer, and we have the identification, the location characteristics and designation, the rainfall as received from Vern and the habitat and site description, and the second value from the bottom there should really be in cpm of ces iumbecause the areal inventory value there is really not valid until we correct the depth distribution function. These are depth 10 distribution.So7that's essentially where the data base stands today. ll think Howard's going-to discuss what followed after our measurements. 12 were the middle team. 13 group. I We — Thefirst was Frosty's, and the second team was our ’ : ae _ 14 CHAIRMAN MOSELEY: Are there any questions? 15 DR. AUXIER: John, I wasJust wondering. That photograph (JK-6) which 16 shows the angular distribution calibration detector in the Lab, that was a 17 setup, 18 calibration in the Lab like that, did you? I presume, 19 DR. KORANDA: 20 DR. AUXIER: just for the ‘photograph? We sure did. You didn't really do the = Well, how did you take account of the fact that as you go_ 21 around the arc, that the 5 ratio for albedo would vary so markedly with 22 angle? 7 23 DR. KORANDA: I don't use albedo in that context. 24 DR. AUXIER: Well, to say it differently,just -say that the room 25 return will vary markedly from -- for instance at the bottom of the arc the 26 source is getting scattering back from the floor much moremarkedly than it would be over at the 900 angle or 70° angle. 28 DR. KORANDA: I don't think I can deduce that. 87 Oo you have any ideas